The Bands Visit

The Bands Visit

An Interview with David Leach and his colleagues

Jason Smith, Robert Ash, Jack Wagner

Maestro David A. Leach is a true Michigander: born, educated, and giving a lifetime of service in music education and life inspiring to the next generations. Speaking with him on the phone is a pleasure, yet seems only a small indicator of what his influence must be like in person. He has spent over 20 years as Director of Bands for the Ann Arbor Pioneer High School, and a portion of that as Chairman of Fine and Performing Arts.

Four of Ann Arbor’s high school bands will be traveling to Carnegie Hall later this month (March 30) for a resplendent showcase: Pioneer, Skyline, Huron (concert bands), and Community (jazz).

Jason Smith, director of the Skyline High band, wants everyone to know “When you go off to college and later on, perhaps when you have a family, and are looking back to your high school years, you might not remember the specific pieces we worked on, but you’ll remember that it was a time to be together in a creative way with some of your best friends.  While we’re fortunate that many Ann Arbor parents give their kids a chance to hear jazz and classical music, that isn’t so for every family; therefore, in many cases it’s not only an opportunity to perform together but also the only chance to travel.

Jack Wagner, the conductor of the Community High Jazz Band states: “We in the Community High Jazz Program are excited, humbled, and honored to join our counterparts in the band programs from across Ann Arbor to perform at Carnegie Hall. Many have said ‘jazz is freedom,’ so we look forward to celebrating that on a stage that has featured Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker, Billie Holiday, and Benny Goodman.

David Leach radiates positivity and gratitude, constantly reiterating how lucky he and his band programs are to be in a supportive community, one that puts a priority on funding for the arts. Instruments are provided from fifth grade on, if desired or needed, and at least twenty percent of his students continue after high school, majoring in music education or performance.

He stresses the importance of music as a life skill, how it necessarily sharpens listening, cooperation, coordination. Are you listening, America? There are four levels of concert band, so no one needs to feel excluded simply on the basis of where they are in playing ability. Even in some challenging instances of ADHD or autism spectrum, the focus on the musical task at hand in the moment nearly always helps these serious issues fade into the background.

Leach encourages his students to “live in the moment” (good advice for anyone!), and to revel in the physicality of playing their instruments, to remember the “big picture,” and to experience passion through the music. Adolescence for many can be a chaotic, tough transition emotionally, so this channel is even more vital.

After nearly two years of rehearsing via Zoom, everyone is thrilled to be able to make music in person again, though the important lesson “we are all in this together” won’t soon be forgotten. Robert Ash, Director of Bands at Huron High School said: “A lot has been taken away from us in music and the performing arts world over the past two years; to see the students in person and see how and why we perform together is magical.  So it’s a great privilege, after not meeting in person as an ensemble for all this time, to connect with students and colleagues across our district and city and to share this with our American community at large at one of the world’s most renowned concert halls.”

One of Mr. Leach’s former students, encountered by chance, went on to become a pediatric oncologist. However, he never forgot a gentle correcting remark made by Leach in high school marching band rehearsal: “hold still, every motion is magnified by the white band gloves.” The doctor retained that necessity for stillness in his medical practice, a valuable asset.

Taking his band to China was a definite highpoint both for Mr. Leach and, of course, the students. He relates: “When everyone meets, they realize that this world isn’t about toxic politics. These are people who express feelings just as we do, and hunger for beauty.”

He humorously referenced a cult-favorite cookie bakery on New York’s upper west side: Levain, a pilgrimage he and his wife plan to repeat this month. Keep feeding your students and audiences beauty, sir, and enjoy a well-earned cookie or two!

Share

A Splendid Torch – Two Evenings in New York

A Splendid Torch – Two Evenings in New York

George Bernard Shaw wrote that “We don’t stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” Saint Patrick’s Day seems a good time to remember these words of the wise Dubliner, and two age-defying performances in New York this past weekend seemed to support that saying. One was a play at the Cort Theatre with the inimitable Glenda Jackson, age 83, in the title role of Shakespeare’s King Lear, and the other was a cello concert at Symphony Space (the Thalia) by Harry Wimmer, now in his nineties. Both evenings were a mix of the theatrical and the musical, King Lear drawing many musicians to hear the incidental music composed especially for it by Philip Glass (b. 1937), and Harry Wimmer’s program “Laugh a Little” blending his highly celebrated cello playing with related puns, witticisms, and sayings of Shakespeare and others. Both were evenings not to be forgotten.

The King Lear production, currently in previews, is directed by Sam Gold and offers a chance to see the legendary Glenda Jackson in the classically male title role that she brought to the Old Vic in London three years ago, causing quite a stir. That gender-bending issue proved here not to be so focal as much as her age – Glenda Jackson is simply too young (“kidding, not kidding,” as the children say). Seriously, one couldn’t help noticing that Ms. Jackson had clearer delivery and projection than nearly every other actor as she held the audience spellbound. As Lear’s world crumbled, she even seemed physically to shrink, such is her acting power, only to expand enough to hold her dying Cordelia. She inhabits this role three hours a night, seven days a week, and is, as my usually understated guest called her on Friday, “off-the-charts amazing.”

And the music? I had my doubts about adding music of Philip Glass to King Lear, but all doubts were allayed. It was delicately wrought, performed onstage but far in the back by a string quartet and later switching with the scene changes to other corners of the stage. The musicians were violinists Cenovia Cummins and Martin Agee, violist Chris Cardone, and cellist Stephanie Cummins, and they were appropriately unobtrusive with some special lyrical moments. Alternating a distant texture of minor thirds and wavering tritones with episodes of greater intensity (and silence), the music reflected occasionally a hint of Elizabethan spirit, though most of it was in keeping with the hypnotic Glass style most of us know and appreciate; Glass fans coming to focus on this music will have trouble, however, as it had a transparency (no pun intended) that allowed the focus to be elsewhere, as one would hope. The production itself seemed to this reviewer to throw in too many distractions from Shakespeare’s own powerful language, but then it is still in its previews and may likely take on more of the power of its lead.

“All the world’s a stage, and most of us are desperately unrehearsed” said Sean O’Casey, and we have Harry Wimmer to thank for reminding us of the bon mot, one of many choice quips throughout his Saturday evening concert, “Laugh a Little” (including words of Shakespeare, Shaw, Melville, Wilde, Prokofiev, Ogden Nash, Alfred Hitchcock, and Groucho Marx). Of course, his concert could not have been not unrehearsed, as it offered a perfectly seamless flow from a huge range of musical selections to enlightening stories and banter. From the opening Toccata of Frescobaldi (arr. Cassadó) and Albeniz’s Tango with pianist collaborator extraordinaire Eduard Laurel, there was no note without meaning. He closed his first half with Beethoven’s highly challenging Variations on Mozart’s Magic Flute and opened the second half with Falla’s Ritual Fire Dance in a Piatigorsky transcription.

This concert was held in memory of Mr. Wimmer’s wife Shirley Givens, world-renowned violinist and beloved teacher, who passed away last year (and proceeds went to a fellowship in her name for the International Chamber Orchestra of Puerto Rico). Shirley Givens’ many stellar students have included Pamela Frank, Joseph Lin, and David Kim, among others, and one of her special ones, Alexis Walls, was present to join the duo of Laurel and Wimmer in a tender rendition of Grainger’s Colonial Song. Ms. Walls later lit into Kreisler’s Sicilienne and Rigaudon with exceptional virtuosity.

Other offerings included vibrant performances from son Kevin Wimmer, one of the premier Cajun fiddlers in Louisiana, with excellent swing/jazz guitarist Tom Mitchell. Interspersed among musical selections, there were appearances from actor, Robert Raines Martin, who added his jokes and antics to the evening, lest things get too tearful, but tears were inevitable from audience members. The Django Reinhardt piece Tears, with father and son playing, was a heartbreaker. Also deeply moving were cello-piano performances The Swan from the Saint-Saëns Carnival of the Animals and Ernest Bloch’s Prayer, from the Jewish Cycle.

For full disclosure, Harry Wimmer and his late wife happen to have been close friends of my parents, but this reviewer’s musical respect exists apart from that, and though Harry has a very modest demeanor, he has received praise from Pablo Casals and Bruno Walter, among others. A little-known fact is that he performed the premiere of Bartók’s Cello Concerto as part of a New York Concert in 1960 (long before what is usually listed as the premiere by Janos Starker decades later). He has played and taught in illustrious venues all over the world, but for more details one can visit About Harry Wimmer. Whatever the accolades and laurels, there is little that compares to continuing it all as a nonagenarian.

This weekend was a good cure for having been sent quite a few viral videos of toddlers playing Bach – not that those are not perfectly delightful, but these two evenings were a reminder that the more one lives the more one can express. They were testaments to the human spirit and inspirations to behold. As George Bernard Shaw said, “Life is no brief candle to me. It is a sort of splendid torch, which I have got a hold of for the moment, and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before handing it on to future generations.”

Share

Unlocking Beauty: A conversation with pianist Terry Eder, founder of “Key Pianists”

Unlocking Beauty: A conversation with pianist Terry Eder, founder of “Key Pianists”

A remarkable act of musical and financial philanthropy is taking place in one of New York City’s loveliest jewel-box concert halls, the intimate Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall. The series is known as Key Pianists, and 2016/2017 marks the second season of its existence.

Detroit-born pianist Terry Eder had the idea that there were certain pianists of merit who were being passed over, as it were, by the musical system. They play with “wisdom, insight, and sensitivity” and they deserve an opportunity to be heard to their best advantage, and audiences deserve to hear them, in an intimate, small hall with clear acoustics and good sight lines.

Ms. Eder, whose own musical accomplishments make her “key,” taught herself Hungarian, a notoriously difficult language, and studied the composers with whom she is closely identified: Bartók, Kodály, and Dohnányi, at the famed Franz Liszt Academy in Budapest.

Last year, to begin her enterprise, she presented the renowned Beethoven interpreter Peter Takács, a former teacher of hers, in a three-concert overview of Beethoven’s music (including chamber music): early, middle, and late. The concerts were very well-attended and received. Interested readers can access my reviews by clicking on the following links: Early Beethoven/ Middle Beethoven/ Late Beethoven.

Encouraged to continue, this season will have three concerts as well, each with its own pianist, the legendary Chopin specialist Ann Schein, Ms. Eder herself, and Sara Davis Buechner in a Japanese/French “fusion” recital.

Ms. Eder and I conversed over lunch recently. She is a petite, vivacious woman, with great passion for the piano and the experience of live music. After some years following a different career path (lawyer), she has returned to her first love. Her energy radiates; she practices four hours a day (quality instead of quantity); and she is now studying Mandarin Chinese.

To put it as succinctly as possible- Ms. Eder believes in the immediacy of the live concert experience, coupled with performers who possess not just great ability, but who also have charisma—the ability to create the chemistry of rapt attention among the audience. For this to happen, a small hall is ideal, thus Weill is the perfect location.

Ms. Eder wishes to change a general perception of the “third” hall in the Carnegie complex as merely a venue for debutant artists by presenting a high-quality, important series of events: Key Pianists. She stresses the importance of the live concerts as a communal activity of utmost value, especially in a technologically driven era like ours (the ubiquitous cell phone, social media, etc.).

A frequent attendee of the major piano series in New York series, Ms. Eder became troubled by the sameness of many of the presentations in the big halls—as well as the too-trendy avant-garde locations that are sprouting at a great rate. She is constantly searching for pianists who would fit the “key” quality. She stated that this is, by nature, quite subjective. She is looking for what she calls “sincerity with every note.” When I asked her about a “dream list” for the future, she ventured Janina Fialkowska, not often heard in the United States, let alone New York.

I mentioned philanthropy in paragraph one. These events are entirely financed by Ms. Eder herself, an immense tribute to those invited to perform, and a true commitment to bringing beauty to New York. For more information, follow this link: Key Pianists Series 2016/2017

Come hear what makes a Key Pianist, and unlock some beauty for yourself!

 

Share

The Musical Father Figures We All Need: In Conversation with Stecher and Horowitz

The Musical Father Figures We All Need: In Conversation with Stecher and Horowitz

The Musical Father Figures We All Need: In Conversation with Stecher and Horowitz

Language has become so debased in our time, words no longer seem to mean what they once did, but one thing I can guarantee; an hour spent with duo-pianists Melvin Stecher and Norman Horowitz reveal them to be gentlemen, in the truest sense of the word. These dapper men have more energy than most people one-quarter their age. Their manners are impeccable, and their nurturing musical philosophy has kept them and their students going for decades. Their transformation from one of the world’s leading piano duos (five decades) to educators (four decades) to philanthropists (two decades) is dazzling.

They never said “no” to anything, beginning back in their post-student days as a touring two-piano team. Whether it was an engagement in an unlikely and extremely remote area, hauling the two concert grand pianos in a succession of vans and custom-built trucks, the unloading of said pianos, each weighing close to 1000 pounds, nearly freezing to death in the unheated cab of their truck during winter, innumerable vehicle breakdowns, etc, they displayed an unbelievable work ethic. They attended every single scheduled social event pre- or post-concert, with the result being reengagement, the “gold standard” for any group, and they functioned during the heyday of the Community Concerts series of Columbia Artists Management. As duo-pianists they did not shun appearing in cocktail bars with popular repertoire, while the very same men commissioned and premiered the Walter Piston Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra, a landmark in the twentieth century American two-piano literature.

While on a groundbreaking tour of Central and South America with the Roger Wagner Chorale, a near-fatal medical emergency caused them to consider a new strategy. That, and memories of experiences at summer music camps for children inspired the opening of the Stecher and Horowitz School of the Arts in Cedarhurst, Long Island, which had 500 students and a faculty of 25. Their hands-on style resulted in yet another seemingly incredible nurturing environment where young musically talented children could pursue lessons with the confidence that they would be given the best lessons and extras available from a faculty that shared the values of the founders.

Then came the evolution of the New York International Piano Competition, first held in 2002 (biennial), which has become known as the “no-elimination” competition. If one is selected to participate as an accepted contestant, it is because he or she belongs there. Everyone receives a finalist cash award of $1000 (if not awarded one of the top seven prizes) and career guidance and mentoring. This has created such a fund of goodwill that past participants often come to New York just to attend the subsequent competitions and to see their “musical fathers” again.

This year’s competition is being held at the Manhattan School of Music from June 20 to 24; it is open to the public free of charge (with the slight exception of the closing ceremonies). I myself have witnessed the duo’s expertise with high-tech videos submitted and played back for judgment by Stecher and Horowitz and the Screening Jury. The contestants make four short videos, one for each required repertoire category: Bach, classical period, romantic period, and one Chopin etude. From over 150 received, Stecher and Horowitz reduce the number to 40, at which point a “screening jury” is called in: this year 22 finalists will be playing in person. They all submit a handwritten letter to Stecher and Horowitz about themselves, which reveals a great deal, even in those whose first language is not English, always the personal touch.

Each of the contestants gets to program two 25-minute recitals, during which they are not stopped with the traditional (and soul-killing) “Thank you very much,” etc. There is a concerto round (with second piano accompaniment). They also all must prepare two four-hand works, with a partner they don’t meet until they get there: this year’s repertoire is the delightful Gazebo Dances by John Corigliano and Mozart’s Sonata in C Major, K. 521, first movement. AND they all must play from memory (on one of the two recital programs) the newly commissioned work: Two Impromptus by Lowell Liebermann, which they receive only ten weeks prior to the competition (!). The score contains such delights as 11 against 5 in the same hand, but these challenges will undoubtedly be more than met.

The jury itself is composed of the highest quality pianists from all over the world not members of the “factory” conservatory approach to producing musicians; and none of them are allowed to have a student in the competition, so the integrity is unimpeachable. This year’s jury includes: Tong-Il Han, Ian Hobson, Orli Shaham, Jane Coop, Jeffrey Swann, and Erik T. Tawaststjerna.

In past seasons, even non “first” prize winners have gone on to give major concerto appearances and other recitals, as a direct result of the supportive climate (and realistic advice about careers and repertoire) created by the two gentlemen. One thing they noted fondly was that the more recent generations no longer sneer at advanced degrees in music education, which offers a more reliable career, and one in which their nurtured backgrounds may lead them to be even more effective stewards of future musicians.

You really need to share in the atmosphere of this endeavor, and support your favorite players. You won’t soon forget it!

Share

2014 Concours de Genève  Piano Finals

2014 Concours de Genève Piano Finals

On the evening of December 2nd, the Concours de Genève returned to the Victoria Hall, this time with the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande and British conductor Alexander Shelleyfor the final round of the 2014 piano competition.  Four competitors remained from earlier rounds and, in contrast to the flute finals the evening before when by coincidence all three players performed the same two pieces, this time the program was more varied.  Only one  work was repeated and, really, who could object to hearing the Beethoven 4th Concerto twice in one evening?

The first pianist to play was Honggi Kim, 25, from South Korea, in the Beethoven 4th.  Initially, his reading struck me as too matter of fact, particularly the opening piano solo which can say a very great deal in five short bars.  However, as Mr. Kim went on, I began to appreciate the strengths in his playing: his respect for the score, his spectacular éclat in brilliant passages — a glittering quality that he never allowed to tip over into mindless virtuosity.  It was lean and clean playing of the very best sort, and it was perfectly clear that whatever Mr. Kim wanted to do, he did compellingly and with commitment.  This did not always work to his advantage, though, because it made all the more obvious the stretches when he wasn’t quite convinced of what he should be doing and he allowed the tight leash he had on the audience to slacken.

Ji-Yeong Mun

Ji-Yeong Mun – First Prize

Next on the program was Pallavi Mahidhara, 27, from the US.  Her concerto was the demanding and virtuosic Prokofiev 3rd, but the odd thing about her performance was that she didn’t really take full advantage of its obvious audience appeal.  The tempos in all three movements were decidedly on the slow side.  She was gorgeous in the lyrical themes (and yes, even in this barn burner of a piece, there are passages of almost super-Romantic lushness).  But this concerto needs to fly and, with the leisurely tempos and beat-laden inflections, it felt mostly earthbound.

Russian Igor Andreev, 26, took the stage after intermission to perform Chopin’s 2nd Concerto and during its long orchestral introduction I was a little alarmed by the slow pace.  Once Andreev began to play however orchestra and soloist began to move a bit and settled into a comfortable tempo.  Critical to any Chopin performance is a certain amount of rhythmic freedom, but this work in particular can easily lead pianists to indulge in excesses that constitute, well, shall we say bad taste?  In Mr. Andreev’s case he was admirably well aware of this and his innate good taste led him in the opposite direction. There was some delightfully sly playing in the mazurka-like sections of the final movement, but as a whole performance it did feel a bit straight-jacketed and that, coupled with a few (very few) too many finger slips may have put him out of the running.

 

18-year old Ji-Yeong Mun of South Korea was assigned the last spot on the program and she took good advantage of it with a straightforward performance of the Beethoven 4th that also had its moments of charm.  Her opening was warmer and more appealing than her colleague’s and her dynamic range seemed to me a little wider.  Her playing was never less than technically immaculate but I think both of these excellent pianists will play a better 4th in ten years when the elusive something in this piece, through experience, becomes more available to them.

Unknown-2

Pallavi Mahidhara- Second Prize

L’Orchestre de la suisse romande, and particularly conductor Alexander Shelley, did a fine job of accompanying — not an easy task in these concerti.  Of course it could be argued that Mr. Shelley was born to it.  His father is the superb concert pianist Howard Shelley.

Unknown

Honggi Kim – Third Prize

Results
First Prize:   Ji-Yeong Mun (18 years old, South Korea)
Second Prize:   Pallavi Mahidhara (27 years old, USA)
Third Prize:    Honggi Kim (25 years old, South Korea)
Share

2014 Concours de Genève Flute Finals

2014 Concours de Genève Flute Finals

 

The flute finals of the 2014 Concours de Genève were held this evening (December 1st) in the festive setting of the flamboyantly rococo and acoustically fabulous Victoria Hall. Accompaniment was supplied by the Geneva Chamber Orchestra led by Nicholas Chalvin. The luck of the draw, combined with the admirable refusal of the judges to be influenced by programming considerations when choosing the finalists, resulted in an evening that featured only two works — Mozart’s Concerto in D Major, K.314 (a transcription of his C Major Oboe Concerto, and the Concerto for Flute and Strings (1958) by André Jolivet — repeated three times each.

The Three Winners

The Three Winners —  Adriana Ferreira, Yubeen Kim, Elena Badaeva

 

 

First to play was Elena Badaeva, 25, from Russia, whose swooping, balletic hijinks didn’t improve her somewhat airy tone and, I think, contributed to a tendency to be just under the pitch in long notes. She played with impeccable accuracy and good taste, which perhaps also led her to take less than full advantage of cadenza opportunities in the Mozart. And speaking of the Mozart, there was some wonderful oboe and horn playing from the orchestra but the strings were too often a little fuzzy around the edges. Paradoxically, the problem was less apparent in the much more difficult Jolivet.

Elena Badaeva

Elena Badaeva

South Korean Yubeen Kim, aged only 17, is already a real master of his instrument. Musically, his playing had life and immediacy, a way of keeping the audience’s attention without dropping the musical line for a moment which is the mark of a real artist. He already has his own signature sound — slightly hollow and chiffy, and squarely in the center of the pitch — something he manages to preserve even in extremes of register. And then there’s his infallible technical exactitude, and an attractively quiet stance in this age of more histrionic players. A real musician.

Yubeen Kim

Yubeen Kim

25-year-old Adriana Ferreira, from Portugal, had all the strengths of Mr. Kim, perhaps a little wilder and with less of her own stamp sound-wise but both the Mozart and the Jolivet bloomed in her performances. Despite the evening’s programming shortcomings, it really was fascinating to hear three gifted musicians bring their individual perspectives to the same two pieces. The audience bore up well under the repetitions and gave each player a warm reception.

Adriana Ferreira

Adriana Ferreira

Results

1st Prize: not awarded

2nd Prize: co-equal Mr. Yubeen Kim (South Korea) and Ms. Adriana Ferreira (Portugal)

3rd Prize: Ms. Elena Badaeva (Russia)

Mr. Kim also won both the Audience Prize and the Young Audience Prize.

Share

Concours de Genève

Concours de Genève

The Geneva Competition’s 75th Anniversary 
November 26, 2014

As the Concours de Genève continues in Geneva, Switzerland, I had the opportunity to speak with Didier Schnorhk, Secretary General of the competition, who told me a bit about the history of the concours, its first grand prize winner, Arturo Benedetto Michelangeli, and how the event is run.

In the mid-1930s French-Swiss composer and organist Henri Gagnebin began to explore the possibility of creating a music competition at the Geneva Conservatory of music where he was Director.  He sought the advice of his friend Frédéric Liebstoeckl, who was then running a music competition in Vienna. 1938, just ahead of the Nazi annexation of Austria, Liebstoeckl, who was Jewish, fled to Geneva and together they opened the first competition in June, 1939.

The eventual winner, a young Italian pianist, almost didn’t make it to the event.  With so many people trying to leave Europe before the outbreak of war, the trip from his home in Milan to Geneva which should have taken 6 hours turned into several days.  The 19 year old musician had to bribe his way onto the trains and he arrived at the competition broke, exhausted and without accommodations. He won anyway and thus began both the great career of Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli, and the sterling reputation of the Concours de Genève.  That September Nazi Germany invaded Poland and the world was drawn into the cataclysm of World War II.  Switzerland remained a neutral country but musicians of other nationalities could not get to Geneva to compete and so the Concours during the war years was restricted to Swiss citizens and those like Georg Solti, a 1942 winner in piano, who were already in the country.

From the beginning, private donors joined with the City and Canton of Geneva to fund the expenses of the Concours, a situation that continues today.  The leadership of the competition has remained unusually stable as well.  Mr. Liebestoeckl remained as its Secretary General for 40 years until his death in 1979 and Didier Schnorhk has occupied that position for more than 15 years now. Trustees of the foundation that runs the competition are selected from the great performing organizations of Geneva — l’Orchestre de la Suisse romande, Grand Théâtre (Opéra de Genève) and the Geneva Conservatory and an Artistic Advisory committee chooses jurors insuring the highest standards.  The featured disciplines rotate each year among a surprisingly wide variety of instruments, voice and composition.

Finalists in flute and piano will play their ultimate rounds on December 1st and 2nd and the prizes, totaling upwards of $50,000, will be awarded.  The competition will end with masterclasses by the distinguished French pianist Pascal Rogé, Chairman of the piano jury then the contestants will return home and, in a remarkable act of continuity which has resulted in the presentation of this extraordinary international competition every year since the end of the war, the organizers will hunker down to begin planning for the 2015 Concours de Genève. This one for composers.

Share

2014 Concours de Genève First Round Flute Results

2014 Concours de Genève First Round Flute Results

2014 Concours de Genève First Round Flute Results
November 20, 2014
 

The opening round of the 2014 flute competition at the Concours de Genève (Geneva International Music Competition) has resulted in 18 competitors from 9 countries moving on to the round to be held on November 22nd and 23rd.  The first round selections were made from recitals of three pieces — Sigfrid Karg-
Elert’s Sonata Appassionata, C.P.E Bach’s Sonate for flute solo, as well as a contemporary piece from a list of 20th Century works by Georges Benjamin, Luciano Berio, Elliot Carter, Heinz Holliger, Philippe Hurel, Betsy Jolas, Tristan Murail and Toru Takemitsu.

The 18 competitors selected to continue are: Mayuko AKIMOTO (22, Japan), Elena BADAEVA (25, Russia), Hélène BOULEGUE (24, France), Ting-Wei CHEN (24, Taiwan), Hyunseo CHEON (17, South Korea), Adriana FERREIRA (24, Portugal), Julia HABENSCHUSS (24, Austria), Sébastian JACOT (27, Switzerland), Yubeen KIM (17, South Korea), Yuki KOYAMA (28, Japan), Helena MACHEREL (19, Switzerland), Alexander MARINESKU (26, Russia), Sarah OUAKRAT (27, France), Yaeram PARK (18, South Korea), Ji Weon RYU (22, South Korea), Sojeong SON (25, South Korea), Pantxoa URTIZBEREA (22, France) and Mark XIAO (27, Australia).

Share

75th Anniversary of the Concours de Genève begins in Switzerland in Review

75th Anniversary of the Concours de Genève begins in Switzerland in Review

75th Anniversary of the Concours de Genève begins in Switzerland
November 20, 2014
The Geneva International Music Competition, better known by its more elegant French title, Concours de Genève, celebrates its 75th anniversary this year.  Founded by Belgian composer and organist Henri Gagnebin who was then Director of the conservatory in Geneva, the first competition was held during the ominous days of July, 1939 on the brink of the outbreak of World War II.  Despite the shadows gathered over that first concourse, the jurors chose well: Italian pianist Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli, then just 19 years old, was awarded  the Premier Prix, a choice that helped establish the competition among the most prestigious music prizes in the world.
Since that first edition, there have been 68 more — a more or less yearly event  with a handful of exceptions — and the long list of other prizewinners includes dozens of the most famous artists to grace concert stages across the world, among them:  Sir Georg Solti, Martha Argerich, Victoria de los Angeles, Paul Doktor, Friedrich Gulda, Maurizio Pollini, Heinz Hollinger, Elly Ameling, Maurice André, Pierre Laurent-Aimard, The Melos and Vegh String Quartets as well as the current Music Director of the New York Philharmonic, Alan Gilbert.
The 2014 edition will award prizes for Flute and Piano in performance rounds which began November 16th.  The competitors have been chosen from more than 300 applicants from 19 countries ranging in age from 17 to 29.  There are two international juries deciding the winners — acclaimed French concert pianist Pascal Rogé heads the piano jury and Emily Benyon, principal flutist of the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra, chairs for flute. I am looking forward to covering the Finals — for flute on December 1st and for piano on December 2nd — when the selected pianists will perform with the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande under the direction of British conductor Alexander Shelley, and the flutists with the Geneva Chamber Orchestra, Nicolas Chalvin, conducting.  Watch for the reviews.
Share

14th Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition in Review

14th Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition in Review

14th Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition
Tel Aviv Museum of Art (Stages 1&2), Heichal Hatarbut (Finals), Tel Aviv, Israel
May 13-29, 2014

 

This year marked the 40th anniversary of the quadrennial Arthur Rubinstein Competition, held in Tel Aviv for two weeks in May. First Prize went to 25-year-old Antonii Baryshevskyi, of Ukraine; Second Prize to American Steven Lin, also 25, and Third Prize to Seong-Jin Cho, 20, of South Korea. There were also co-equal prizes given to the other three of the six Finalists —18- year-old Leonardo Colafelice of Italy, Maria Mazo, 31, of Russia, and Andrejs Osokins, 29, of Latvia. As we’ve all come to expect, the level of playing was very high and it struck me that on another day, the order of prizes could easily have come out differently. In any case, a distinguished competition like the Rubinstein demonstrates just how many really good young pianists are out there these days. Now that the compliments (and prizes of up to $40,000) have been handed out (For a complete list of winners, click here: 14th Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition Prize Winners List) , let’s get to the performances.

First a general comment. It bothers me a good deal that most of the competitors, though not necessarily the winners, seem to feel desperate to make something outsized of the slightest turn within a phrase instead of playing out the long arches that would make sense of the works as a whole, and the effort drives them to make eye-rolling, grimacing, swooning cartoon faces in practically every other measure. If this bizarre habit added anything to the performances, I wouldn’t object — truly — but the result actually is the opposite, and it comes from a lack of understanding of the musical architecture they are trying to project. Maybe this is attributable to modern life — the noisiness and constant motion, the demand for instant gratification from even the smallest things, the quick-cut editing that plagues everything from contemporary movies, TV shows and commercials, to the 140 characters of a Tweet. There seems to be no long view any more. Watching one of the competitors play the opening of Appassionata as her face reflected in turn solemnity, horror, sticky sweetness, and what seemed to me like amusement, all in about fifteen seconds, looked (and sounded) an awful lot like schizophrenia. Worse yet, these expressions are applied on top of the music like Halloween makeup instead of emerging naturally from within it, and these little titivations are so numerous and follow so quickly one on the other that they make no long-term sense. As we are further and further removed in time from the very unmodern environment that produced this music in the first place, I really wonder if we can ever get back the physically quiet and straightforward approach of the best artists of earlier generations.

And now to the performers: Antonii Baryshevskyi opened his first recital with one of the competition’s pieces imposées, Benjamin Yusupov’s Subconscious Labyrinths — a daring way to introduce himself to the audience and jurors. He took full advantage of the lyrical elements in the work and his command of beautiful tone did a lot to make the unfamiliar and often clangingly dissonant piece palatable in a way that many of the others failed to do. His Pictures at an Exhibition was warm-toned and the characterizations popped out in high relief. His Scriabin had an appropriately perfumed and slightly debauched aura, but of all his recital pieces I was most taken with the Schumann 2nd Sonata. It’s a slender and classicist piece, but with a wild streak that requires a relentless drive and very fast fingers and here Baryshevskyi really made you feel the wind in your face. I was less happy with his concerti — the Mozart D minor, K.466 and the Prokofiev 2nd. Both seemed to me to plod a bit.

I’ve heard 25-year-old American pianist Steven Lin often in the last couple of years. He’s always been an impressive player, and the technical megawattage required to toss off the Don Juan Fantasy, Petrouschka, Hungarian Rhapsody No. 6 and other pyrotechnic repertoire seems to come naturally to him. In this competition though, it was his Bach (the French Overture) and Beethoven (Sonata Op. 31, No. 3) which really demanded attention. His natural phrasing, free of the anguished twistings and turnings of some of his colleagues, sounded refreshing, and when it came to Schumann’s turbulent and passionate 3rd Sonata, all the blood and thunder you could wish for was there. His Beethoven 1st Concerto was grand and spacious with a humorous twinkle when it was needed, and his Prokofiev 2nd Concerto I thought edged Baryshevskyi’s by being a little more flexible and singing, especially in the broad opening tune of the first movement.

Seong-Jin Cho is a more puzzling case. He had a lot of fans at the competition, and the jury clearly thought highly of him. He overcomes the thorniest technical problems easily and has a neat and polished surface but, I think he has an insecure grasp of the rhetoric — the language and grammar — of 18th and 19th century repertoire. His BartókOut of Doors Suite and his account of the required piece (Subconscious Labyrinths again) were compelling, but pretty much all of the earlier music he played suffered from fussiness and the constant (and maddening) cheating of climaxes in an attempt to make them more dramatic. As with actors of a certain kind, you can see the gears working — also, like Lang Lang, I found Mr. Cho hard to watch.

There were a number of competitors who didn’t make the finals for one reason or another but nevertheless gave astonishingly good performances. I’ll mention two, although there are certainly more who deserve recognition. Marcin Koziak, a 25-year-old Pole now living in Texas, has a stunning command, but his cleanly chiseled sound and wonderfully natural phrasing were marred this time around by a few too many finger slips. He is, however, a real artist who I look forward to hearing again. Another is 21-year-old Russian Nikolay Khozyainov, who opened his recital with a meltingly beautiful Pavane by Ravel in which the piano seemed to have acquired a bow to draw out the melody with seamless legato while the accompaniment floated around it like incense. This young man is a master of romantic tone, amply displayed in Rachmaninoff’s First Sonata as well. Feux-follets went less well, as it often does, and that was enough to put him out of the running.

 

Share