Distinguished Concerts International (DCINY) presents Total Vocal with Deke Sharon in Review

Distinguished Concerts International (DCINY) presents Total Vocal with Deke Sharon in Review

Deke Sharon, Conductor, Arranger, and Creative Director
DCappella, Special Guests
Vintage Mix, Special Guests
Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Stern Auditorium at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
March 24, 2019

 

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) held yet another large-scale concert on Sunday at Carnegie Hall with its production of Total Vocal with Deke Sharon, 5th Anniversary. For those unfamiliar with the name Deke Sharon, he is a leading force (arguably the leading force) behind the enormous resurgence of a cappella singing here in the US and around the world for the past few decades. As arranger and conductor, Deke Sharon was a producer of The Sing-Off, an a cappella singing competition that was on television from 2009-2014, and it spawned numerous similar enterprises. Perhaps the best-known a cappella film, Pitch Perfect (2012) was followed with sequels Pitch Perfect II in 2015 and Pitch Perfect III in 2017. There seems no sign of the craze letting up, and this 5th anniversary concert helped affirm that fact.

Featured on this concert were smashing a cappella arrangements nearly all made by Deke Sharon (and one original composition). Mr. Sharon has made over 2000 arrangements, and they are eminently appealing and singable. For full disclosure, much of the music popular with these largely teenaged performers is not generally my cup of tea – it generally leaves me craving a Bach Fugue or a Brahms Sextet; that said, very few people with a pulse could resist the sheer joy in music-making that these groups share. Guests joining the Distinguished Concert Singers International included the Disney ensemble DCappella, guests from The Sing-Off and Pitch Perfect films, and the singing quadruplet ensemble, Vintage Mix.

Once a few hundred mostly young singers had filed onto risers on the Stern Auditorium stage, their charismatic leader Deke Sharon launched the music with fun.Medley (no typo – that is the name) from the show The Sing-Off (credited to Jeff Bhasker, Andrew Dost, Jack Antonoff, and Nate Ruess). The three songs of the medley were Some Nights, Carry On, and We are Young. It was full of energy and fun, with eighteen soloists cranking up the excitement, but thanks to some overdone amplifying it was almost unbearably loud. Covering one’s ears tightly barely helped. One started worrying about how one would endure the next few hours, but the electrifying presence of Deke Sharon managed to sustain one’s hope.

Not to sound like a fangirl (happily married old gal here), but the tall, athletic Deke Sharon has one of the most magnetic stage personalities one has ever encountered. To say he exudes energy, rhythm, and joy is wholly inadequate – he is a phenomenon. He appears virtually airborne as he covers the entire stage in a few strides and conducts with a uniquely agile and exuberant dance, drawing ecstatic energy from his musicians. In his role as emcee he excels as well, and, as he greeted the audience after the first number, he took on the role of cruise director (complete with humorous references to old television shows Gilligan’s Island and The Love Boat). His travel-themed banter helped string together a program of some fairly disparate music.

Forget About the Boy (from the 2002 Thoroughly Modern Millie, music by Jeanine Tesori) took us back to flapper days with a jazz-age beat (and thankfully more listenable volume -perhaps because there were no guest artist microphone requirements?). The segue to a love song was a natural, and Beneath Your Beautiful (by Mike Posner from Pitch Slapped) fit the bill. With the chorus in the role of “string orchestra” the featured soloists Martel Jones, Aryanna Rent, John Yokoyama, and Chelsea Rifkin sang beautifully.

I’ll Make a Man Out of You (from Mulan – Matthew Wilder) featured guest artists Chamber Bravura (consisting of 35 vocalists) in a passionate and tightly knit performance. I Wanna Be Like You (by Robert Sherman and Richard Sherman) followed with special guest group DCappella (four men and three women) giving their all. Amps were all still overpoweringly loud, but one still enjoyed the spirit through cupped ears.

Bellas Opening (a medley by various artists from Pitch Perfect 2) included the catchy tune Timber and a quote from America the Beautiful. Soloists were Madeline Glave and Lilly Gaven, with Madeleine Lasker as the excellent vocal percussionist (often called beatbox). One of the fun aspects of a cappella singing, of course, is the range of vocal techniques used to substitute for traditional instruments – and these effects throughout the concert were amazing.

It’s A Man’s World (James Brown) featured the group Unstremental (around fifteen singers), reveling in melisma like the inimitable Brown himself. Travelin’ Band (John Fogerty) followed without any miked soloists, but with full choral forces in a spirited delivery of its rock and roll beat, it had the perfect sound. The audience joined in the infectious fun with clapping. A more pensive song, I Lived (Ryan Tedder), followed as a welcome breather in a lovely arrangement.

The afternoon’s only arrangement not by Deke Sharon was Connecticut (Hugh Martin and Ralph Blane, arr. Adam Bock) with special guests Vintage Mix, a group of quadruplets (yes, quadruplets!) who sang with a not-surprising familial blend and synchronization. The song itself, new to this listener, occupies a rather obscure niche, but it was a good vehicle for these sensational siblings (three sisters and a brother) who took the audience back to the days of close harmony singing (reminiscent of the barbershop quartets of the 1890’s, revived in the 1940’s). Deke Sharon (ever the teacher and leader) used the performance as a springboard to get the audience to try some part singing (with surprisingly decent results), before the first portion of the program concluded with the chorus singing the Earth, Wind & Fire hit, September (Maurice White) with Reed Rosenberg, vocal percussionist. At the risk of sounding curmudgeonly, I don’t share Mr. Sharon’s enthusiasm for this song, but it certainly did make for a high-voltage close.

To continue for just another moment in curmudgeonly mode, Carnegie Hall is a beautifully resonant hall that does not require the heavy amplification that was used, and in fact one of the beauties of a cappella singing is its focus on the music one can make with just the human body, though admittedly a soloist may need some amplification to be heard over a large chorus (and certainly the vocal percussionists do); that said, the decibel levels here were so painful that an older woman in my row actually (demonstratively) removed her hearing aids, while others repeatedly jolted and cringed. I was prodded to relay to some assistants milling about the stage at intermission that some in the audience were actually in pain. For the second half the issue was much improved – though whether that was because of modified settings or one’s newly encroaching deafness remains uncertain.

Grievances receded, in any case, as one watched the force of nature that is Deke Sharon bounding back to the stage, seemingly made out of music. He led the chorus in the relatively unknown Elton John song Club at the End of the Street (Bernie Taupin) and followed with the ever-popular Blue Skies (Irving Berlin) with Bekal Peterson and Madeline Ross, jazz soloists, scatting to beat the band. A mellower feel was setting in, and Blue Skies made a nice segue to the popular Soak Up the Sun (Sheryl Crow and Jeff Trott) with eighteen soloists and Filip Rusin as vocal percussionist, all excellent.

One of the big standouts of the evening was the ensemble Revv52 (around fifty singers from Canada), featured next in Moondance (Van Morrison). With beautiful intonation, smooth blending, and seductive rhythm, they revived this sometimes forgotten hit from the seventies.

Just when one thought the concert had reached a peak, we heard Quiet Moon, composed and sung by Deke Sharon himself – he has (not surprisingly) a beautiful voice! He was joined by Antonio Fernandez from DCappella, and both did impressive vocal percussion as well. Many in the audience gasped in admiration as Mr. Sharon alternated his gently crooning vocals with some of the best “mouth trumpet” one has ever heard. For those unfamiliar with this skill, it is the simulation, using one’s own mouth, of the sounds of trumpets – and Mr. Sharon did two kinds, in rapid alternation with vocal phrases. Nothing could quite top the latter, but Defying Gravity (Stephen Schwartz) from Wicked was excellent – lovelier than I had remembered it, undoubtedly due in part to the arrangement.

The superb Croatian ensemble, A.K.A. Crescendo, was welcomed next (a dozen or so musicians) to sing a medley of Jailhouse Rock/Levisice (Mike Stoller, Daniel Popovic, and Alka Vuica). They ought perhaps to be renamed “A.K.A. Accelerando” for the beautifully synchronized way they handed some ramping up of the tempo, but let it suffice to say that they were great, another polished and tightly knit group. The full chorus followed with As (by Stevie Wonder, 1976) as arranged for the Sing-Off winners, Committed.

Approaching the end of the program, the group DCappella returned to give a fittingly sentimental rendition of Remember Me from the 2017 movie Coco (music by Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez). It was even more heartrending than the original in this Deke Sharon arrangement. Finally, riding the wave of the 2018 movie Bohemian Rhapsody, the combined forces of DCappella, Vintage Mix, and Distinguished Concert Singers International gave a passionate rendition of Don’t Stop Me Now (Freddie Mercury). Singers streamed down the aisles stirring up audience members to join in the singing and clapping. An encore of The Lion Sleeps Tonight, complete with rhythmic “Wimbawet” sections, capped the concert off well.

Several audience members who appeared cranky, uncomfortable, and impatient at the concert’s start could be seen bobbing, swaying, and tapping hands and feet by the end. Many looked high on music. If the spirit of this concert resembled an evangelical event, in a way it was. Deke Sharon believes in the power of music to transform the world, and he shows how it is done, drawing people together through the love of it (even sharing his email for anyone in the audience who may not be able to find a chorus to join). When he says that music can transform people, it may sound like a platitude, but I wouldn’t doubt his sincerity for an instant. This concert itself gave ample evidence.

Share

Vocal Artists Management Presents Jinho Hwang in Review

Vocal Artists Management Presents Jinho Hwang in Review

Jinho Hwang, tenor; Steven Crawford, pianist
Marc A. Scorca Hall, The National Opera Center, New York, NY
March 22, 2019

 

Sogno di Primavera, or Dream of Spring, was the title of tenor Jinho Hwang’s recent recital at the National Opera Center, and it was an evening that reflected Romantic dreams as well as optimistic beginnings. Though Mr. Hwang is not at the beginning of his career, with various prizes and noteworthy operatic appearances behind him, he seems to be enjoying a comeback of sorts after some unspecified medical challenge he alluded to from the stage at the end of the concert – and he appears to have fully recovered. The audience, many of whom undoubtedly have been with him through it all, were fervently supporting him.

Mr. Hwang’s program was full of impassioned and sensuous music about love and nature, predominantly Italian art songs (Bellini and Tosti) with a few Italian opera arias (Donizetti, Verdi, and Cilea), a French aria (Massenet), and two Korean songs (by Panghil Park and Geung Soo Lim). The texts were wide-ranging, suggesting longing, nostalgia, euphoria, and despondency, and brimming with Romantic imagery of roses, rivers, kisses and tears. The works lived up to the title, Dream of Spring – with Tosti’s Aprile feeling especially fitting as we speed toward the end of March.

As for Mr. Hwang himself, he seems to possess all of the vocal ingredients that one should need for a fine career; the main question, though, is how he will use those ingredients, in what balance, to what degree when, and in what repertoire. He has an extremely powerful voice, for example, and yet it did not always work to his advantage in a hall with such extremely live acoustics as the Marc A. Scorca Hall at the National Opera Center. One is faced generally with several choices in such cases: switch halls, switch repertoire, or scale down one’s dynamics. One would hesitate to suggest switching halls, as this one is a fine, intimate space and boasts a nice seven-foot Yamaha piano. The repertoire switch is probably not the answer either, as, even in the more delicate pieces such as Tosti’s A vucchella, the sound still came across as overly bright. The remaining option is to make big vocal adjustments, something any artist needs to learn to do throughout a career – and yet all remained overpowering. One was left guessing whether the hall acoustics were misleading from the performer’s standpoint or the dominance of such a consistently big sound was actually an artistic preference. There also seemed to be a preponderance of high drama from which some quieter miniatures would have offered relief, the sort of gentle miniature that is perhaps not typical on an audition demo recording but exists as art. Programming is an art in itself, and ideally it balances dramatic tension and urgency with release.

Music of the bel canto master Vincenzo Bellini opened the concert. Rather than opt for Bellini’s operatic arias, Mr. Hwang chose five songs from the more intimate Ariette da Camera (omitting only the fourth, Almen se non poss’io). The first two selections, Ma rendi pur contento and Malinconia ninfa gentile had glimmers of the beautiful timbres of which this singer is capable, but it seemed that Mr. Hwang was already working for large-scale operatic projection, as if directing his sound to the back row at La Scala. This approach did not reel in the listener as one hopes from an opener, but rather tended to draw the listener’s ears toward whatever imperfections of intonation there may have been as the singer was still finding his stride. Mr. Hwang does not appear to make things easy on himself.

In Vanne, o rosa fortunata, the superb collaborative pianist Steven Crawford provided a gently playful introduction, and it set the tone for a more relaxed, less stentorian approach. Mr Hwang here reflected more of the character of the text and also sang with delight in the diction (one dazzlingly rolled “R” comes to mind).

The following Bellini selections, Bella Nice, che d’amore and Per pietà, bell’idol mio again showed tremendous power. The latter enjoyed some glorious high notes, and Mr. Hwang was especially compelling in the unaccompanied sections, as if his gifts had been waiting for the cue to soar with increased freedom. More of that freedom elsewhere, paired with a search for more dynamic low points, will help deepen these pieces even further.

Two twentieth-century Korean pieces followed the Bellini group, Twilight over the mountain by Pan Ghil Park and As if spring comes across the river by Geung Soo Lim. Both were evocative in the manner of film scores, and both showed the singer at his most expressive so far. He then turned to opera arias to close the program’s first half, maximizing the drama in Donizetti’s Una furtive lagrima (from L’elisir d’amore) and lending a swagger to Verdi’s La mia Letizia infondere (from I Lombardi). He was quite visibly expressive in both of these, and – it should be mentioned as well – had a regal bearing throughout, which should serve him well in his operatic roles.

A beautiful array of six art songs by Francesco Tosti opened the second half. La serenata brought a gently rolling feeling to the program, and Mr. Hwang sang it with a natural ease, as it demands. It was followed by L’ultima canzone, A vucchella, Ideale, Aprile, and finally L’alba separa dalla luce l’ombra, all with moments that reminded one in purely vocal qualities of some of the great tenors of the past. What will ripen these pieces further will be more of a focus on the musical uniqueness of each one, irrespective of any issues of technique, passaggio or vocal fixations of any kind. It is always interesting to note how even many of the so-called technical challenges fall more easily into place as one gets away from audition-style demonstrations of skill and goes more deeply into the music. Of course, the opera world is filled with buzz about this or that singer’s “high C” and other strenuous achievements, but many listeners simply want music, with all its nuance, color, and variety.

The last two works were dramatic tours de force which elicited Mr. Hwang’s all, Massenet’s Pourquoi me réveiller (from Werther), with some magnificent vocal peaks, and Cilea’s E la solita storia del pastore (from L’Arlesiana). They closed the program with brilliance from both performers, drawing hearty ovations from the audience. There is no question that this singer has remarkable gifts, and – as one noticed a video camera filming it all from the back – one imagines some of the concert will result in some excellent demos and roles to come. There is much promise for Jinho Hwang – now may he enjoy the ride!

After some humble thanks to his friends, family, and God, Mr. Hwang announced that he would sing one more song, Grace of God. He sang it in Korean, with considerable emotion, and it was quite moving.

 

Share

Juilliard School Daniel Saidenberg Faculty Recital Series presents Manasse/Nakamatsu Duo in Review

Juilliard School Daniel Saidenberg Faculty Recital Series presents Manasse/Nakamatsu Duo in Review

Jon Manasse, clarinet; Jon Nakamatsu, piano
Paul Recital Hall, Juilliard School, New York, NY
March 18, 2019

 

The Juilliard School’s faculty recital series presented the “two Jons” on Monday night in Paul Hall at the school: world-renowned clarinetist Jon Manasse, and equally celebrated pianist Jon Nakamatsu, who, as Mr. Manasse drolly put it in his affable and humorous verbal program notes, “merely” won the gold medal at the 10th Van Cliburn piano competition in 1997. In fact, Mr. Manasse was the only Juilliard faculty member in this recital (he also did all his music study there)—Mr. Nakamatsu majored in German at Stanford prior to winning the Cliburn (!). The duo is in its fifteenth year, and the two are co-artistic directors of the Cape Cod Chamber Music Festival.

Well, let me not further bury the lead: This was the finest chamber music collaboration I have heard in many years. Saying that these two are at the peak of their profession would be demeaning—they hover somewhere in the stratosphere, and the little peaks are far below. They created a true sense of chamber intimacy, used understatement effectively, had supernatural ensemble unity and great elasticity when called for, and were very natural and spontaneous. (And we all know how much hard work goes into sounding effortless!)

The program opened with the first of Brahms’ two autumnal clarinet sonatas, the F minor, Op. 120, No. 1, inspired by clarinetist Richard Mühlfeld. Curiously, the notoriously gruff Brahms referred to the clarinetist as “Fräulein Mühlfeld” (Miss M.). They are Brahms’ final instrumental chamber music, full of longing, poignancy, reminiscence, even regret, with only the occasional jovial outburst. Shadows intrude even in the middle section of the Ländler/Waltz-fusion third movement. The Manasse/Nakamatsu duo was superb in this work (they have recorded both sonatas). Jon Manasse, a master of whisper-quiet but always steady tone, blended so successfully with his partner that one often could not tell (without effort) just which instrument was playing. Here he was aided by the absolute discretion, which does not mean subservience, of his partner. It was incredible to hear the sometimes thick textures played with such clarity, melodic/motivic direction, and softness, and Mr. Nakamatsu always pays attention to the left hand, so important in a dark-hued work like this, bringing out every polyphonic goodie. Their tempo (marked Vivace by Brahms) in the fourth movement’s joyful, optimistic explosion was one of the quickest I have ever heard, utterly clear in every detail.

This was followed by Mr. Nakamatsu’s moment to shine as a solo player, in a breathtaking rendition of Chopin’s Grande Polonaise Brillante précédée d’un Andante spianato, as the original title page states. Spianato means “flowing, smooth” in Italian, and this performance could not have been more elegant. The supportive left-hand was “there” yet appropriately indistinct, while the right hand spun out the long threads of Bellinian bel canto so crucial to Chopin’s expression. Mr. Nakamatsu handled the groups of “little notes,” delicate fioriture that adorn the melodies, with stunning feather lightness. He embodies (they both embody) what I recognize as “true” virtuosity: the ability always to have something in reserve, never to be at the outer edge of one’s capabilities, but to seem to be saying to the listener: “Oh, yes, of course I can do this; I could do so much more too, but I’m choosing not to right now.” His phrasing in the wistful little mazurka that interrupts the andante was perfect, the grander, more heroic bluster of the polonaise never lost an opportunity for elegant, refined, poetic tone, and there was plenty of flash where appropriate.
After intermission, the pair returned, virtually duplicating the program of another of their recordings, beginning with Leonard Bernstein’s Sonata for Clarinet and Piano, composed when he was in his early twenties and dedicated to David Oppenheim, a clarinetist he met at Tanglewood while studying conducting with Serge Koussevitsky and composition with Paul Hindemith. Oppenheim later became a producer for Columbia classical records, and television, both of which would be crucial to Bernstein’s image going forward. Much has been made of the sometimes derivative sound of portions of the work: a bit of Hindemith here, a little more of Copland there. But Mr. Manasse pointed out the consistency of the Bernstein gesture and how one might hear “pre”-echoes of, yes, West Side Story, still far in the future. The duo was fabulously together in the asymmetrical (lots of 5s) rhythms and other challenges the work is loaded with, and the whole needs to sound just easy-going, which it did. The work is in two movements, but the second has both a “slow” and a “fast” movement in alternation—a formal innovation that is subtle in a youthful composer.

Then it was Mr. Manasse’s turn to play unaccompanied clarinet, in the third (of four) movements from Paquito D’Rivera’s The Cape Cod Files, commissioned by the duo, an homage called Lecuonerías. Ernesto Lecuona was a Cuban composer and pianist of great fame, and his work is recently receiving some of the serious consideration it deserves. (Who remembers “The Breeze and I,” English lyrics added in 1940 to Lecuona’s Andalucia?) This fiendishly difficult brief morsel contains an encyclopedia of Latin musical gestures, from flamenco cante jondo recitative at the beginning, to various enthusiastic dances. All were played with the consummate ease and wit we associate with the name Jon Manasse.

The duo then finished with Four Rags for Two Jons, by John Novacek, the duo’s first commission (2006). Chopin turned the mazurka, waltz, and polonaise into stylized “art” dances. So, why shouldn’t Novacek create his own wild take on the Joplin-era staple? These four pieces have all the usual syncopation one expects in the style, but so much more as well: stylish and wickedly difficult riffs abound in both instruments. I think I heard (and saw) a hilarious forearm cluster played by the unflappable Mr. Nakamatsu. Glissandi, blues, wails- it’s all there, and the way the duo tossed it all off spoke to their camaraderie.

After a tumultuous ovation, the pair favored the audience with a spicy, jazzy (and difficult) take on Gershwin’s “I Got Rhythm,” arranged by James Cohen (91-years-young, and present at the concert). It contained the inevitable reference to the famous clarinet opening of the same composer’s Rhapsody in Blue and the piano’s final peroration from the same piece (now used in the United Airlines commercials), dispatched with great hammy humor by Mr. Manasse and Mr. Nakamatsu.

Share

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) Presents Magnificat in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) Presents Magnificat in Review

Distinguished Concerts Orchestra and Distinguished Concerts Singers International;
Jonathan Griffith, Artistic Director and Principal Conductor; Nancy Menk, Guest Conductor;
Claire Leyden, Soprano; Lindsey Anderson, Mezzo-Soprano; Jennifer Zetlan, Soprano
Stern Auditorium/Perelman Stage at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
March 17, 2019

 

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presented another large-scale concert this weekend, entitled Magnificat: Music in Celebration of International Women’s Day. The first half included works by Johannes Michael Haydn, Ralph Vaughan Williams, Johannes Brahms, Libby Larsen, Ola Gjeilo, and Zachary Moore, all for women’s choir and orchestra under the direction of Dr. Nancy Menk. The second half was entirely devoted to John Rutter’s Magnificat for mixed choir and orchestra, under the direction of DCINY Artistic Director Jonathan Griffith. As ever, it was an extravaganza, with several hundred voices from all over the world and audience members barely able to contain their excitement, applause, and cheers.

The Magnificat text was present not only in Rutter’s great piece by that name on the second half, but also in several works on the first half. For those unfamiliar with the term Magnificat, it traditionally refers to the musical setting of the Canticle [or Biblical hymn] of Mary, which contains the words that the Virgin Mary spoke (according to the Gospel of Saint Luke) right after the Annunciation (the announcement by the Angel Gabriel that she would soon be giving birth to Jesus Christ). Magnificat settings can also include words spoken to Mary at the Annunciation, and also those about her, along with related texts of the Gloria, Ave Maria (Hail Mary) and more, but in any case, a concert dedicated to the Magnificat centers upon Mary.

Magnificat was thus an appropriate name for a Women’s Day celebration and for a concert billed as a celebration of the 175th Anniversary of Saint Mary’s College in South Bend, Indiana (Saint Mary here also referring to the Virgin Mary). Two choirs from Saint Mary’s College, their college choir and alumnae choir, represented the school well under Dr. Menk, their Chair of Music, who led them through works in varied styles, including a work which the college commissioned from Libby Larsen 25 years ago, Canticle of Mary. Their combined forces, along with the rest of the Distinguished Concert Singers International, totaled around 260 choristers to share the stage with the Distinguished Concerts Orchestra.

The programming was brilliant, not monochromatic as one might expect with such unity of theme, and even the staunchest atheist would probably acknowledge the power of the music itself, along with its fascinating history. The concert opened with Johann Michael Haydn, the underappreciated younger brother of Franz Joseph Haydn, and his brief beautiful Magnificat served as a somewhat restrained classical greeting before the more involved works to come. It also provided an introduction to this half’s two soloists, soprano Claire Leyden and mezzo-soprano Lindsey Anderson, both excellent.

In complete contrast with the Haydn, the Vaughan Williams Magnificat followed, its mystical atmosphere intensified by shadowy chromaticism and sinuous flute lines. This setting is no heavenly harmony suggesting a serene Mary, but rather an eerie evocation of supernatural forces, its imaginative orchestration eliciting awe from the start. Mezzo Lindsey Anderson was the powerful soloist, singing with outstanding tonal control and a projection of the music’s mystery and grandeur. In what was skillful programming, the Ave Maria, Op. 12 of Brahms followed, relatively delicate in its orchestration, moving to simpler F major harmonies and a lighter pastoral spirit. The chorus sang it with reverent purity.

Dr. Menk conducted expertly throughout her portion of the program, but her skill was especially in evidence in the remaining works, including Libby Larsen’s Canticle of Mary, a canticle of unusual jubilation. Opening with an oboe solo, which in the composer’s words “represents the exuberance and free spirit” of Mary, the piece pulses with anticipation and joy. The choral singers gave their all, and soprano Claire Leyden sent her piercingly beautiful solo soaring from a balcony near the stage.

Ola Gjeilo’s Gloria followed with similar joy, here in a more folk-like vein and sung with gusto. If the theme of Mary was not overt in the final work, Always Keep This Close, by Zachary J. Moore (b.1992), the overall theme of women was certainly present, with text by Colleen Carhuff expressing the love of singing in a women’s choir. Starting out with nostalgic warmth, it built to a tremendous peak, closing with the repeated words “We are one.” The combined choruses were indeed one.

To cap off a brilliantly conceived concert, the second half featured the Magnificat of leading British choral composer, John Rutter (b. 1945). Larger in scope than the Magnificats heard earlier on the program (the longest of those being the twelve-minute Vaughan Williams piece), Rutter’s work spans forty minutes over the course of seven movements. It was interesting to compare how differently Rutter set some of the same text as other composers, for example, the line “the rich he hath sent empty away” which Vaughan Williams punctuated with dramatic rests, while Rutter chose to set it to gentle soothing harmonies. Clearly such a text has inexhaustible possibilities.

John Rutter is a master of his art, and the listener was held in his thrall from his Magnificat’s very first notes. Though Rutter has strangely been criticized for incorporating elements of lighter twentieth-century music (as if he is to remain in an aesthetic vacuum), his music is indisputably rooted in a British tradition that includes Benjamin Britten, David Willcocks, and others. His Magnificat reflects eclectic influences of the late twentieth century as well, but all in what seems to this listener to be a perfectly organic way.

In the first movement, Magnificat anima mea, there are shifts from the feeling of 3/4 to 6/8 via sharp accents, establishing an immediate energy, and these were projected with vigor by the performers. The mood was suitably contemplative in the movement Of a Rose, a lovely Rose, a movement hearkening back to works by Bach and other earlier composers, but the music regained the brassy power of the twentieth century in the third movement, Quia fecit mihi magna. Full mixed choruses produced a big sound, including fifteen choirs from California, Colorado, Indiana, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, as well as Australia, Canada, and the UK, and, as DCINY always lists “individual singers from around the globe.” Jonathan Griffith held the masses together beautifully, as always.

Superb soprano Jennifer Zetlan was the soloist throughout this work, and her fluid golden tones were particularly beautiful in the fourth movement, Et Misericordia, conveying a sense of solace after the prior fanfares – and before the muscle-flexing fifth movement, Fecit potentiam. The latter was given such assertive projection by the lower voices that it seemed at any moment ready to burst into,“the Jets are gonna have their way tonight” (from Bernstein’s West Side Story) – in other words, it was not lacking in testosterone! One could only admire the way Rutter developed his material here in brilliant imitation before subsiding with the final line about the meek (humiles). The milder Esurientes followed, opening gently with harp and affirming heavenly promises, with the help again of lovely solo lines from Ms. Zetlan, and the subsequent Gloria Patri with cymbal crashes (and the return of the opening rhythms) made for a triumphant end to this wonderful work. It was a triumphant end to a great concert as well. Congratulations to all involved, and encore!

Share

Florida State University presents Ian Hobson in Review

Florida State University presents Ian Hobson in Review

Ian Hobson, piano
Judy and Arthur Zankel Hall at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
March 11, 2019

 

Pianist Ian Hobson played a wide-ranging, difficult recital at Zankel Hall on March 11th, which made me answer the following questions in the affirmative: Can a pianist with immense bravura technique also, 1) be intellectually probing, 2) be poetically sensitive, and 3) create imaginative, thoughtful programs? It was in those areas where Mr. Hobson truly surrendered to his pensive, lyrical impulses that he created true magic, though I realize, even as I write those words, that such areas were set-off even more by what was around them. I reviewed Mr. Hobson’s heroic survey of the complete piano music of Debussy and Ravel elsewhere in these pages – Ian Hobson- Debussy/Ravel: April 18. 2018, Ian Hobson- Debussy/Ravel: February 28, 2018, Ian Hobson- Debussy/Ravel: February 7, 2018, Ian Hobson- Debussy/Ravel: November 29, 2017.

The evening began with Beethoven’s two-movement sonata in E minor, Op. 90. The first movement, in the minor, is a study in contrast and concision, with anger, melancholy, and even a nostalgic wistfulness, which Mr. Hobson brought out beautifully. Then the falling minor third is transformed into a rising major third for the second movement, a rondo that captures Beethoven in rare Schubertian expansion. Rather than a love-song for all humanity, I’ve always thought it quite personal, possibly even to the “immortal beloved,” whoever she might have been. Here, I wish Mr. Hobson had followed the nicht zu geschwind (not too fast) indication, giving a bit more gemütlichkeit, time spent allowing the music to unspool. Nevertheless, it was well-played.

He then followed with some Mendelssohn that had a Beethoven connection, the Variations sérieuses, Op. 54, which was part of the general fund-raising initiative for the Beethoven monument in Bonn (unveiled in 1845), to which Chopin, Liszt, and Schumann, among others, also contributed. The work is a set of evolving accelerations (primarily) on an original, chromatic, sober theme in D minor, called “serious” to differentiate it from the many sets of variations brillantes based on existing popular tunes or opera arias that composers were expected to churn out for the growing amateur market. The somber minor key is broken only once, about three-fourths of the way through with a D major, hymn-like moment of calm amid the storms. Mr. Hobson organized all the furor with his mighty skills, though I wished for more quiet at the outset, lower dynamics and more contrast in places, so the journey could “go farther.” It was an exciting rendition of a piece I wish was played more often.

The first half concluded with Schumann’s third sonata (the first to be started, however), in G minor, Op. 22. Here Mr. Hobson was truly magnificent. He was right in his element, handling all the manic rhythmic dislocation and busy-ness with complete command. He brought out the many polyphonic felicities in the first movement, but it was in the slow movement, based on an early song of Schumann, that he created spellbinding magic with his quiet playing. The rondo finale, marked Presto, was a wild ride that delighted the entire audience, justly so, yet he phrased the contrasting lyrical theme with greatest sensitivity, varying it through its many repetitions.

After intermission came an old chestnut that one rarely hears these days, Ernő Dohnányi’s Rhapsody in C major, Op. 11, No. 3. I have heard the legendaries (think Annie Fischer or Shura Cherkassky) sport with this four-and-a-half minute madcap, antic piece just as a kitten would play with a ball of string. Mr. Hobson added an element of substance to the piece without losing the humor entirely; that seemed to say he was making it a “more important” piece, and why not.

Then came a world premiere from American composer/conductor/pianist Robert Chumbley, titled Brahmsiana II (Brahmsiana I is an orchestral ballet score). As the composer states, this is no pastiche and no quoting of Brahms takes place; rather it was inspired by certain compositional techniques of Brhams. The three “new intermezzi” were in Chumbley’s characteristic lush neo-Romantic style, and they used the piano gratefully, even if I wasn’t really feeling much about Brahms per se. Chumbley doesn’t quite possess Brahms’ austerity or motivic unity. I sensed that in the first two pieces, the endings came too quickly, they didn’t feel organic and inevitable; but the third made a satisfying conclusion indeed. Mr. Hobson’s detailed and lavish colorations really added value to this group.

The recital concluded with Chopin’s masterful third piano sonata, Op. 58 in B minor. Here Mr. Hobson’s magic occurred in the elfin-light Scherzo and its heartbreaking contrasting middle section; his funereal song third movement was stately and gorgeous too. My only quibble was with the outer movements, which were played too fast—the first (Allegro) is qualified by maestoso (stately, dignified, majestic), it was pushed; the finale is marked (admittedly odd): Presto non tanto (not too presto). Here, for me, it was “too,” causing a lot of details to fall by the wayside, and reminding me of the early 20th century curmudgeon Henry Krehbiel, who I believe referred to this movement as “the parade ground of the virtuosi.” Still, it was an astonishing display of digital ability, fiery and completely involved emotionally, and it thrilled the audience to no end.

Mr. Hobson offered two (strongly earned!) encores: Tchaikovsky/Rachmaninoff’s Lullaby, Op. 16, limpid and full of elegant sorrow. The second was the Mendelssohn/Rachmaninoff Scherzo from the incidental music to A Midsummer Night’s Dream, more than enough for four, let alone two, hands. (Did I even hear some extra notes added, via Horowitz or perhaps Hobson?) Mr. Hobson’s presentation of the major-key lyrical theme that occurs twice was breathtakingly light, as was his “vanishing” conclusion.

Share

Key Pianists presents Jason Hardink in Review

Key Pianists presents Jason Hardink in Review

Jason Hardink, piano
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
February 26, 2019

 

Jason Hardink demonstrated why he deserves to be known as a “key” pianist on Tuesday evening to a nearly-full house at Weill Recital Hall. He made the strongest impression in the thorny 20th century works that he has made his calling card: Eckardt, Xenakis, Messiaen. His strengths are: a prodigious memory and uncanny independence of hands and fingers that allows him to create extremes of contrasting sonority, both soft and loud, often simultaneously; he is very musical, and I believed every note he played. I did take issue with a few interpretive choices, which I shall try to elucidate below. By the way, he did create some of the best program notes I have read in many a season—regular readers of New York Concert Review know how passionate I am about program notes.

Mr. Hardink plunged right in with Echoes’ White Veil by Jason Eckardt (b. 1971). This work supposedly inspired him to view “virtuosity” as a door to the sacred, so to speak. The piece, based on a prose poem by W.S. Merwin, is very active, with a few strategic oases of calm. I did not have the score available to study prior to this concert, so I am only reacting to what I heard in the moment. The sheer ferociousness of Mr. Hardink’s commitment translated, often, into ferociousness of keyboard attack, which I felt served this particular music very well. I heard the “bolting of the gates of Thermopylae” as though it was happening right next door, more than anything else.

Mr. Hardink then turned his attention to the hermetic, contemplative “second series” of Images for piano by Debussy. In the first two in particular ( Cloches à travers les feuilles and Et la lune descend sur le temple qui fut), depicting bell-sounds through leaves and moonlight on a former temple, Debussy seems to have almost achieved a state of “musical Nirvana,” that is no longer goal-directed. I say almost because they are not entirely free of human regret and a unique kind of Debussyian pessimism. Here Mr. Hardink’s tonal sensitivity was a pleasure, though for me there can always be more sonorous layers of bells (at the beginning)—most players give up after defining about four of them, Mr. Hardink reached six by my count. Passages marked très en dehors (very brought out) were often minimized. The final movement, Poissons d’or, about a pair of Japanese carp on a black lacquer bowl in Debussy’s possession, though played in the “correct” tempo, seemed jammed, and a bit lacking in elegance and wit.

The first half concluded with Xenakis’ evryali, meaning either “open ocean” or one of the snake-haired Gorgons. This was truly terrifying, and I mean that in the best possible way. The instrument thundered, and the occasional written-out silences only increased the tension. By the way, Mr. Hardink played all these fearsome scores (the whole program in fact) completely from memory.

After intermission, I had more to take issue with. The first group consisted of four of Liszt’s Transcendental Etudes, revised twice from their initial version. Again, Mr. Hardink’s boldness of approach I could accept as legitimate—he plunged headlong into every one of them, with tempi that were quite rapid (though indicated as such). Liszt’s music could have used more expansion, grandeur, and rubato. Sometimes we need to “help” the composer’s music to sound even “better” than it is. Singing lines needed to sing more. Also there was some rather eccentric “post-modern” pedaling instead of the daring mixtures that Liszt requests. The rapidity of execution was impressive (remember, there’s nothing typical audiences love more than speed and volume), but it robbed the discourse of time to blossom, and Feux follets (Will-o’-the-wisps) was technically uneven in the beginning (after the introduction). The famous Harmonies du soir (Evening harmonies) were stripped of their strategic fermatas—amid the welter of notes, there’s always an opportunity for contemplation. The Wilde Jagd became strident and hectic, though I realize the score quite often encourages it.

The concert closed with four of Messiaen’s Vingt regards sur l’Enfant-Jésus – twenty “looks” at the Christ-Child. These complex pieces showcase Messiaen’s celebrated fervent Catholic mysticism, and they are quite sincere, even when, at times, the music sounds a bit like a popular tune with “wrong notes” and all manner of complicated compositional theories attached. They present (appropriately) nearly super-human challenges to any pianist. Mr. Hardink met every one of them, but he was at his radiant best in the final two: Le baiser de l’Enfant-Jésus (The kiss of the Christ-Child: an ecstatic contemplation of a miracle) and Regard de l’Esprit de joie (The look of the spirit of joy) with its near-drunken orgiastic celebration of the holy. There were certain three-note clusters (A-B-flat-B), the last three low notes on the piano, that he played with his fist, a touch that I found unnecessarily rude and inelegant—they could easily be fingered 3-2-1.

I want to emphasize how very impressive this recital was, and how un-routine the programming was. Mr. Hardink’s basic musicality redeemed every selection, even those where I may have mentioned something that stuck out to me; in fact, had the level of excellence not been so high, I might not have noticed the departures from it.

Mr. Hardink excels at a kind of pianism that I would imagine would make him suitable for Boulez and Stockhausen as well, if he is so inclined. At any rate, one doesn’t often hear bravura technique in the service of such committed ideas, so bravo.

 

Share

Wa Concert Series presents Old is New: Historical Instruments with Cynthia Roberts in Review

Wa Concert Series presents Old is New: Historical Instruments with Cynthia Roberts in Review

Charles Neidich, artistic director, clarinet; Ayako Oshima, clarinet; Cynthia Roberts, violin; William Purvis, French horn; Chloe Fedor, violin; Edson Sheid, viola; Madeline Bouissou, cello
Tenri Cultural Institute, New York, NY
February 23, 2019

 

New York’s intimate and impeccable Wa Concert Series continued its standard of excellence, while opening ears and hearts with a beautiful program of historically informed performances helmed by the veteran violinist Cynthia Roberts. All the musicians speak the grammar of the Classical (or Baroque) period perfectly, yet they never sound like they are giving you a dry lesson on the music. Each piece is lived anew, hence the “new.” Phrasing, articulation, transparency of sonority, sensitivity to harmonic change and chord weight, and flexibility: all were delectable.

 

The evening opened with the Overture in D Major for two clarinets and French horn, HWV 424, one of the earliest uses of the clarinet, by G.F. Handel, no less. Apparently he knew an itinerant clarinetist in England, one Mr. Charles. This should give lie to those who maintain that Mozart’s re-orchestration of Messiah, with added clarinets, is a blasphemy. In this generally open-spirited Overture (not the prelude to something else, nor the double-dotted grandeur of the French overture), the sequence of movements was pleasant, with beautifully traded-off lines among the three players: Charles Neidich, his talented wife (and every concert’s dinner chef) Ayako Oshima, and natural-horn player William Purvis. The softness of the sonorities made this occasional music convincing, and Mr. Purvis formed every single note with his lips and/or his hand in the bell of the horn, a frightening proposition (just try it). One could imagine open fields and non-threatening military type calls.

 

Then came a curiosity, a quartet for clarinet and string trio by the Finnish-born clarinet virtuoso, Bernhard Crusell (1775-1838), an early proponent of Mozart’s music in Scandinavia. Unless you were at this concert, or are a clarinet student or fanatic, you have probably never heard a note of Crusell, which is a shame, for his work abounds in proportional elegance, abundant opportunity for display, and once in a while some startling or mysterious chromaticism, and at times it sounds a “bit” Mozartean. The four movement work was given agile life, especially in the alert communication skills of the three strings: Cynthia Roberts, Edson Scheid, and Madeleine Bouissou. As for Maestro Neidich, I run out of superlatives: he extracts every bit of shifting color from his instrument, always truly singing, even during the most fiendishly show-offy passagework.

 

After intermission came the sublime Mozart Clarinet Quintet, K. 581, a late work whose profundity always astonishes. Mr. Neidich here played the (strange-looking) clarinet that was intended, and used by Stadler, Mozart’s close friend and inveterate money-“borrower.” This large clarinet has a bell that faces inward, at a right angle to the body, and its range is enormous, especially in the deep low register: the octave transpositions that modern clarinet players deface the score with are unnecessary with it. One realizes how perilous these instruments can be, there was a false start just at the very beginning, but it didn’t phase anyone. With the addition to the previous string trio of Chloe Fedor on second violin, the quartet of strings was perfectly in sync, and the balances were utterly refreshing: one was allowed to hear the collegiality of the work, rather than a “diva” statement from either clarinet or first violin, especially with the pleasure these players took in producing the magical aura this piece creates, a radiant smile from Mr. Scheid across the ensemble to Ms. Roberts, for example. Cellist Madeleine Bouissou’s total involvement with the inner life of the lowest voice was a consistent pleasure. The work is in A major, but it is the shifts to minor mode that stab the listener in the heart.

 

The players offered a true encore: a repeat of the Larghetto (second movement) of the Mozart, which was even more ravishing and intimate the second time.

 

Share

Hwaseong City Music Competition Presents New Artists Concert in Review

Hwaseong City Music Competition Presents New Artists Concert in Review

Hwaseong City Chamber Orchestra with featured winning soloists
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
February 21, 2019

 

 

Though many decry what seems to be a cultural decline and lack of discipline in today’s younger generation, there are always rays of hope, and this listener encountered a dozen of them this Thursday at Weill Hall. Twelve young soloists, as winners of the Hwaseong City Music Competition, flew over from South Korea to perform concerto movements with the Hwaseong City Chamber orchestra – and they represented their nation well.

Though the orchestra was small (two winds and around thirteen strings), and understandably given the small stage of Weill Hall with a Steinway grand, the ensemble was valiant, and the soloists were as well. What could have been a marathon evening simply flew by as the parade of extremely accomplished youngsters gave their all, each for about ten minutes. Sadly, their ages and other information were not listed. The conductor led the ensemble admirably, though astonishingly his name was omitted from the program as well (more on that last issue later).

The first performer, violinist Chae-Lin Suh, played L’inverno (Winter) from Vivaldi’s Four Seasons. With a full sound and assertive musicality, she boldly set a high bar for the concert. Occasionally (and possibly with help from adrenaline) she seemed to have a slightly edgier tempo conception than the accompanying ensemble, but as the piece continued, she seemed to energize the group towards her way of thinking. One couldn’t help wishing that there had been an easier way for her to connect visually with the conductor who led from behind her with little chance of eye contact unless she did a one-eighty, but fortunately some expert ears were at work. One doesn’t want to guess Ms. Suh’s age, which could have been anything from fifteen to twenty-four – but suffice it to say that she is already quite an elegant young lady with much potential.

Cellist Man-Jung Kim strode onto stage next to play Popper’s Polonaise de Concert, Op. 14 (first year university, as one gathered from nearby audience members who said they knew him). It was an impressive performance full of élan. He ably negotiated the treacherous high notes in the early cadenza and was unafraid of using expressive slides to convey the grand Romantic spirit. At times the orchestra had some scruffy moments (as one had thought also in the Vivaldi – inevitable perhaps when each instrument is exposed without the cushion of larger forces), but Mr. Kim fared well. He was also somehow able to impart the occasional oblique nod and glance as a cue – well done!

Violinist Jung-Ho Byun dazzled next with the Introduction & Rondo Capriccioso of Saint-Saëns. Looking somewhere in the upper teens in age, he played with a brilliant sound and an impressive degree of accuracy in its most challenging passages. If the sixteenth rests at the opening struck one as surprisingly literal compared to freer versions, he found his comfort zone quickly. It will be wonderful to hear this young player in a year or so to see whether this very famous showpiece will acquire that “tossed off” quality alongside his already considerable technique.

When the little violinist Eun-Seo Cho walked onstage next, there was a slight gasp from some the audience, as she looked no older than perhaps ten years old and played nothing less than Sarasate’s Zigeunerweisen. She handled it with a mature grasp in the passionate Roma melodies and effortless spiccato bowing in its pyrotechnics. This reviewer was ready to jot down how this or that was not quite up to Heifetz’s rendition, only to stop with the realization that my own socks are older than this child, so let it suffice to say that she was amazing. (Now, won’t it be difficult to take that all back if one finds she is actually fifteen and has availed herself of some youth-enhancing technology? Well, then we’ll talk – but she would still be exceptional.)

Just when one thought that prodigies can’t come much smaller, in marched pianist Ye-Seo Nam, looking all of about six or seven. Surely there was some sort of Matryoshka nesting doll backstage – in which case, what could possibly be next? Not to lag behind, though, young Ms. Nam made easy work of Haydn’s Piano Concerto No. 3 in F major – not the third movement as listed in the program but the longer and more involved first movement, which had her fully engaged and moving to the music from the opening orchestral tutti. Her fleet fingers (even with the tricky thirds) may have occasionally needed a bit more “traction” to rein in the speed and keep in perfect alignment with the orchestra, but all in all she was outstanding.

After a bit of onstage shifting to move out the concert grand, the next player entered, pianist Yu-Na Kim, seemingly in her mid to late teens. In some ways, despite the advantage of a few more years, she deserves extra respect for her poise in following such pint-size players (scene-stealers who inspired the famous W. C. Fields advice, “Never work with children or animals”). Ms. Kim sailed through the third movement of Chopin’s Piano Concerto in E minor with grace and authority. The only minor suggestions would be to make some rapid phrase ends less clipped and perhaps to change color and character more in the E-flat major section. Then again, she was impressive simply for pulling off this challenging movement so beautifully with what must have been very little rehearsal (given so may soloists). She also is to be admired for treating the piece as chamber music; at one point, for example, she managed in a long upward run to wait on the penultimate note for the slightly lagging orchestra, so that her top note would be right with them – she is on the ball!

After intermission, the concert resumed with slightly older players in general. Baritone Ji-Seok Lee opened singing Hai gia vinta la causa! from Mozart’s Le Nozze di Figaro. He possesses a magnificent voice, excellent diction, and a commanding stage presence worthy of the Count who delivers this aria. Though there was little in his demeanor (and no gestures) to convey the dramatic aspects of the role, his second selection, Sanchon (or Mountain Village) by Du Nam Cho, elicited his heightened emotions and dramatic involvement – it was a pity that no lyrics were provided. One will certainly look forward to hearing this singer again.

More Sarasate followed, with the Introduction and Tarantella in the capable hands of violinist Sang-Yong Sin. One was becoming rather spoiled by violin virtuosity by this point, but Mr. Sin delivered his solo with tremendous brilliance. The same applied to the next violinist, Hae-Won Choi, who gave a commanding and extremely assertive account of the Praeludium and Allegro of Kreisler (curiously listed on the poster/program with first name “G. P.” rather than Fritz).

Following other players in a group concert is a challenge not to be underestimated, and as the time approached 10PM one felt for these young players. As my colleague Alexandra Eames described so well in a 2011 review (Rutgers Pianists in Review): “To relax and find one’s stride in just one or two pieces is extremely difficult and the performer must go through the same physical preparations (dressing for performance, arriving on time, trying the instrument, etc.) as he would for a full-length recital.  Often the most sensitive artists can be sabotaged by the endeavor, whereas the more arrogant temperaments barrel through their nerves.”

Miraculously there was not a single meltdown the entire evening. Cellist Ye-Won Cho followed with a rhythmic and nimble-fingered account of the third movement of Haydn’s Cello Concerto in C major, and aside from the almost dizzyingly fast tempo that perhaps stemmed from heightened excitement, her account was excellent.

Two pianists were the last performers, starting with Yu-Min Cho, who took on the thorny third movement of Chopin’s Piano Concerto in F Minor. He honored the score with respect and mature musicality, and it was beautiful to behold. It was only through some overpedaling and smudges towards the end that one sensed some fatigue, undoubtedly from waiting through such a long evening. Mr. Cho has the potential for very distinguished playing.

The role of final performer fell to pianist Min-Sun Kim, and that is not an enviable assignment, but she gave an impassioned performance of the first movement of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concerto No. 2. She was decisive and clear in her interpretation, delivering the work’s well-known lyricism with mature musicianship and a singing cantabile right hand, while also unleashing ample firepower for its peaks, particularly its high-voltage finale. It was a grand finale indeed, and one could only marvel at how the skeletal orchestra behind her rallied to meet her, playing their hearts out. Brava!

All the players returned to the stage for a final colorful bow, and a representative from the competition (whose name was hard to make out if it was indeed announced) remarked that the competition would be arranging another concert here within a year. He also introduced an honored guest (again with a name hard to discern) to present five special certificates, which went to cellist Ye-Won Cho, violinist Eun-Seo Cho, baritone Ji-Seok Lee, and pianists Ye-Seo Nam and Min-Sun Kim.

The Hwaseong City Music Competition’s organizers certainly know how to find talent, and now it is clear that they know their way here – all a good thing! They also appear to have some corporate backers to help make it happen (notably Kia via their poster); it should not take much more, therefore, to fine-tune the presentation itself (as the musicians had done). The program, really more of a concert flyer, seemed rather hastily assembled with too many typographical errors, and there should not have been any question as to the name of the conductor, the correct movement to be played, or the details of the competition itself (still a mystery after some web searching). There is probably also a way to arrange for a French horn or trumpet, even given limited space – but again, the musicians were remarkable.

Bravi tutti!

Share

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) Presents Lux et Amor: Music of Dan Forrest and Ola Gjeilo in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) Presents Lux et Amor: Music of Dan Forrest and Ola Gjeilo in Review

Dan Forrest, DCINY Composer-in-Residence, Ola Gjeilo, DCINY Composer-in-Residence and Pianist;
Featuring Distinguished Concerts Orchestra and Distinguished Concerts Singers International;
James M. Meaders and Gary A. Weidenaar, Guest Conductors;
Estelí Gomez, Soprano;
Langley High School Concert Band (VA); Doug Martin, Director; Kyle Harrington, Assistant Director;
Stern Auditorium/Perelman Stage at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
February 18, 2019

 

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) served up another one of their signature musical banquets this week, and, though there may have been a preponderance of celestial fare, there was, in and out of it all, something for just about everyone. Entitled Lux et Amor (Light and Love), the program featured uplifting works for chorus and orchestra by composers Dan Forrest and Ola Gjeilo, along with an introductory mini-concert played by the Langley High School Wind Band (VA), about which more will be written later. The pairing of these two composers is not a first for DCINY, so the following summary from this reviewer’s write-up from April 15, 2018 (DCINY Dreamweaver in Review) may serve as an introduction for those unfamiliar with them: “Both [Forrest and Gjeilo] happen to have been born in 1978, and both write music that employs rather conservative tonality in exploring spiritual themes. Both are part of a growing wave of choral music that often hearkens back to days of chant, while freely tapping into multicultural or folk material, the simple harmonies and spare textures of New Age music, and some cinematic orchestral elements. Both composers are, perhaps needless to say, immensely popular.”

 Lest these commonalities lead the listener to think of the two composers as two peas in a pod, they are not. Mr. Forrest emerges as an outgrowth of a church tradition that links him with choral composers such as John Rutter, Benjamin Britten, and others. Mr. Gjeilo, also known for some liturgically-themed work, stands apart for the folk inspiration that is part of his Norwegian heritage, for more prevalent jazz and New Age elements, and for the use of piano improvisation in his works.

As for the program title, Lux et Amor, the “Lux” part of the title is easy enough to explain, as the featured Dan Forrest work is itself entitled Lux: The Dawn From On High (2018), given its New York Premiere at this concert. Without making too literal a distinction, the Amor part seems to refer to Ola Gjeilo’s short piece Ubi Caritas, the text of which refers to an ancient hymn line, “Where charity and love are, God is there.” Again, though, the works of both composers on this program were awash with themes of light, love, peace, and all things heavenly.

LUX: The Dawn From On High is Dan Forrest’s third major work for chorus and orchestra, (after Requiem For the Living and Jubilate Deo). It is a forty-minute composition, consisting of five movements which evoke an arch-like journey of light – especially divine Light – through time. The texts range from ancient liturgical chant and Scripture to modern secular love poetry (in particular “The Sun Never Says” by poet Daniel Ladinsky, b. 1948).

The first movement, Illuminare, unfolds from a hallowed vocal unison into the luminous transparency of sound for which Dan Forrest has come to be known. The ensuing Lux in Tenebris employs, as the composer states, “contrasting musical meters and keys to portray its text about light courageously shining in darkness.” Highlights here were the interplay of harp with flute and soulful solo playing from DCINY’s principal cellist, Elizabeth Mikhael, who brought still more of her burnished tone to the third movement, The Sun Never Says. This latter movement has also been performed by Voces8 for a stunning newly released recording, and it is highly recommended. Dan Forrest has an unquestionable gift for understanding and eliciting the sheer beauty of the human voice.

Gloria in Excelsis followed as the fourth movement in a joyful syncopated setting about the Nativity, leading to the final movement, which is in the composer’s words, “an ancient evening hymn, presented as a solo, then unison, then in increasingly complex canons, before a closing section provides closure and unity between these multiple facets of light.” The chorus and orchestra appeared to revel in the music, under the expert guidance of James Meaders (as well as the many choral conductors involved in behind-the-scenes preparation). A hearty ovation brought Mr. Forrest to the stage to take a well-deserved bow.

The second half of the program was dedicated to three works by Ola Gjeilo (pronounced “Yay-lo” for those wondering). The three started with Ubi Caritas, a gentle hymn to love with Mr. Gjeilo at the piano in sparsely textured improvisations (think John Tavener meets a meditative Keith Jarrett).

Dreamweaver followed, a seven-movement work based on a Norwegian medieval folk poem Draumkvedet, which is, as the composer’s notes describe, “an epic ballad sharing some elements with Dante’s The Divine Comedy. The protagonist Olav Åsteson falls asleep on Christmas eve and sleeps for thirteen days, during which his dreams take him on a beautiful but at times frightening journey through the afterlife.” The text of Draumkvedet was adapted skillfully by Charles Anthony Silvestri, who has worked a regular collaborator with Mr. Gjeilo as well as other DCINY artists and composers worldwide. The work itself is accessible and appealing, with artful balancing of its inherent contrasts of darkness, light, sin and redemption. It was given a fine performance by the DCINY chorus and orchestra, under the sure leadership of conductor Gary Weidenaar.

Right from the Prologue of Dreamweaver, Gjeilo establishes a mood of reverence and purity with a seemingly simple hymn (with some bewitching harmonic turns several phrases in), setting the stage for the journey ahead. Highlights of that journey included the solo singing of soprano soloist, Estelí Gomez, who brought her bell-like clarity to the second movement, Dreamsong, and breathtaking high notes in the third movement, The Bridge, as well as in the fifth movement, Paradise. The latter movement truly lived up to its name.

 The fourth movement, Intermezzo, centered on an improvisatory piano solo, played by Mr. Gjeilo himself, and it was an interesting change of texture. The work closed with an Epilogue that essentially reprised the opening Prologue – a full circle worthy of Olav’s journey.

The Gjeilo portion of the program – and the entire concert – ended with his chorale, The Ground, a beautifully wrought hymn for peace. The audience, who seemed not to have read the printed instructions to refrain from applause mid-piece, had clapped throughout the evening between movements, but gave renewed and well-earned applause for the composer and combined forces.

If one could state a general reservation about the concert overall, it just may have been “too much of a good thing.” There was so much to admire in the works of both composers, but the programming of their works together, particularly works of substantial lengths, may not have framed them ideally. Several in the audience commented about the length being too much, and though this listener takes no cues from bystanders, the comments echoed what had already been in mind.

The comparison of a concert to a banquet can go only so far, in that music exists in time, from which a concertgoer cannot slip out or decline second helpings. The result is sweetness upon sweetness harmonically, and the need for some insulin – or at least a pinch of musical “salt.” The only real pinch of salt of the evening was provided at the very beginning by the Langley High School Wind Band, ironic in that the seventy-plus cherub-faced youngsters seemed visually worthy of their own Norman Rockwell portrait. They dove with gusto into to John Philip Sousa’s Bullets and Bayonets, Rimsky-Korsakov’s Dance of the Tumblers (in a Terry Vosbein arrangement), and Grieg’s March of the Trolls (in an arrangement by Brian Beck). Though they did reach deeply into two slow and heartfelt works by Forrest (Good Night, Dear Heart) and Gjeilo (Sanctus), their leaders wisely interspersed these with the zestier fare. They finished their contribution to the program with a celebratory piece entitled Exultate, by Samuel Hazo (b. 1966) – a composer new to this reviewer, but one who clearly feels the pulse of young band musicians today. Doug Martin, Director, and Kyle Harrington, Assistant Director, led them masterfully through their selections, and they should feel quite proud. Congratulations to all involved!

 

Share

Daria Barabanova in Recital

Daria Barabanova in Recital

 Daria Barabanova, pianist
The Gordon K. and Harriet Greenfield Hall, Manhattan School of Music
Sunday, February 3, 2019

 

It is a brave soul who schedules a recital on Super Bowl Sunday close to start time, but it was heartening to see this weekend that a warm gathering of music-lovers was more interested in piano music – or at least one particular pianist – than in making the opening of the Patriots vs. the Rams! Daria Barabanova was the excellent young performer, playing a program of Bach, Debussy, Schubert, Chopin, and Robert Helps (1928-2001).

Ms. Barabanova opened with Bach’s Partita No. 5 in G Major (BWV 829) and established herself immediately as a polished pianist. She has effortless finger technique and clearly a strong musical intellect. While not in the least demonstrative or visibly emotional, she possesses a lovely stage presence as well. Her Preambulum was precise and authoritative, demonstrating excellent control of articulation and tonal balance. Her Allemande was serene and well-paced, with a thoughtfully organized approach to musical shape that would bring cohesion later to her Sarabande as well.

There was the tiniest glitch in the first part of the Allemande, which one assumed might have been a reason for omitting the first repeat, but as it turned out Ms. Barabanova was to omit all the repeats in the Bach (as well as in the entire recital). This reviewer is not a die-hard devotee of doing all repeats always, but there are movements in the Bach Suites that are so short that they definitely benefit from the additional hearing in order to fully register in a listener’s mind. The Corrente, for example, was over in such a flash that, before one could fully surrender to its dance spirit, the Sarabande, had already established its stately presence. Similar observations could be made in regard to the Passepied, an even shorter movement, which was over in a blink. One thought that the advice about “stopping to smell the roses” might be apt – but then again, depending on the artist and the occasion, momentum can be of higher priority.

It should be added that there are plenty of pianists one hears and wishes they would omit repeats, so noting their absence in this case may be construed as a compliment. Ms. Barabanova’s finger technique is one of such sparkling ease and dexterity that it is a joy to hear. High points were her Tempo di Minuetto, given colorful staccato articulations, and the very demanding final Gigue. The latter can so easily turn into a tangled contrapuntal mess if one’s left hand is not fully equal to the right, but it was exemplary here, with each voice projecting superbly.

Three Hommages followed, by the American composer Robert Helps. Ms. Barabanova is to be commended for including these underappreciated pieces. Of special nostalgic expressiveness is the first one, Hommage à Fauré, a twentieth-century (1972) evocation of Fauré’s almost unbearably beautiful harmonic language. Ms. Barabanova played it with sensitivity and a golden sound. Hommage á Rachmaninoff was interesting as well, though as a composition it is not quite as evocative of its title composer as the first piece is. The final Hommage á Ravel is reminiscent at times more of Messiaen than of Ravel, though the latter’s Le Gibet did come to mind, with its haunting darkness. At any rate, Ms. Barabanova sustained interest through its extended hypnotic course. All three were played with the score. As the composer himself stated, these works can be played individually, and this reviewer would cast an unsolicited vote for the first one to be kept in the repertoire as an individual gem, perhaps memorized for the even greater deepening that memorization usually brings.

Debussy’s three-piece set, Pour le piano, rounded out the first half with energy and sparkle. Again Ms. Barabanova’s approach was rather matter-of-fact, but it seemed to suit the Prélude. She showed a good range of tonal color. This reviewer usually prefers the Sarabande a bit slower, but then it was in keeping with the general sense of forward propulsion about the afternoon. The brilliant Toccata finished the set (and the first half) bubbling with youthful spirit.

One had an inkling from the first half’s performances that Franz Schubert’s Sonata in A major, D. 664 would be a good choice for such an unfussy interpreter, and it proved to be so. This work (also known as “the little A major” to distinguish it from the larger one in the same key – and seeming extra “little” with the omission of repeats) is known for its melodic directness and simplicity, and these qualities emerged with admirable clarity. This is not to suggest even remotely that the piece is simple to play; in fact, quite to the contrary, a pianist must be able to transcend its challenges and let it sing without overcomplicating it, and that is what Ms. Barabanova achieved. With seamless technique and a respect for each line, she let the composer’s voice shine through. She also showed her awareness of significant harmonic changes through sensitive shading – and though her fortissimo sections were big, they were never harsh. Where there was a tiny mishap in the third movement, she handled things with consummate professionalism.

Chopin’s Scherzo No. 4 in E major ,Op. 54 closed the program. This was perhaps the least persuasive of all the works on the program, and it seemed that the pianist’s involvement was slightly on the wane, but through it all one heard some skillful coloring, some ingenious pedaling, and some perfectly pealing runs. (The final upward run needed more force and sweep, in this listener’s opinion, but then again, the piano’s balance of registers may not have been helping matters.) The Op. 54 is in some ways the hardest of the four Scherzi to sustain, with its frequent and capricious shifts of harmony and color. Some pianists plunge into each moment and experience each nuance, which can leave the listener dizzy and fatigued; others emphasize the big picture but lose “local color.” This listener would put Sunday’s performance in the second category, with the loss of detail probably contributing to things going a bit awry towards the end – in the grand scheme of things, though, hardly a blip.

All in all, it was a highly auspicious recital by a young pianist who should have quite a bright future.

 

Share