WA Sinfonietta in Review
WA Sinfonietta
Charles Neidich, conductor and soloist
Good Shepherd-Faith Presbyterian Church, New York, NY
March 23, 2025
Regular readers of New York Concert Review are well-acquainted with the WA Concert Series run by the noted clarinetists Charles Neidich and Ayako Oshima Neidich. Tonight marked the inaugural performance of the newly established WA Sinfonietta, under the aegis of the Artena Foundation (founded by the Neidichs). A recent article in New York Concert Review speaks about the foundation and the Sinfonietta’s mission (plus interesting details about this evening’s program), which the reader should investigate : A Conversation with Charles Neidich. Tonight’s program mirrored the October 25, 1885 concert program in which Brahms’s 4th symphony was premiered (though the Mozart Clarinet Concerto tonight replaced the Brahms Violin Concerto that was performed in 1885 ). A large crowd jostled for open seats as the hall filled in anticipation of this exciting event. I might add too that this was one of the most appreciative and supportive audiences that this listener can recall being a part of for some time. It was wonderful to see and hear.
Let’s get my main complaint out of the way. There were no printed program notes, but Mr. Neidich spoke before each work. When you are going to have “spoken program notes” it is imperative that the speaker can be heard by all in the hall without abnormal effort. Mr. Neidich (in his own words) does not have a “stentorian” voice, and much of what he said was not completely audible for much of the audience. Mr. Neidich has a wealth of knowledge to share, and it was regrettable that much of it was lost in the hollows of the hall. A microphone would have easily solved this issue.
Charles Neidich took the floor to be both the conductor and soloist for the Mozart Clarinet Concerto, K.622. Completed in 1791, it was, as Mr. Neidich reminds us, the last large-scale Mozart completed in his lifetime. He plays a version that is probably as close to being authentic as possible (the original manuscript having been lost) on the Basset Clarinet (for which it was originally written), which has an extended lower range.
This work is far and away the most frequently performed clarinet concerto. This listener has had the experience of both hearing it and playing it in ensembles with countless numbers of clarinetists eager to display their “chops” with varying degrees of success. I was anxious to hear what a player of Mr. Neidich’s caliber would do, coupled with the use of a basset clarinet instead of a standard clarinet. As the saying goes, “you’ve heard the rest, now it is time to hear the best.” As I said about Mr. Neidich in an earlier review, it’s not just about the virtuosity, but what you do with it. I’ve heard plenty of soulless exhibitions of technical prowess, and others with lovely tones in slower sections to cover for the muddy “slip-and-slide” passagework in the faster sections. There is none of this with Mr. Neidich – he has virtuosity in spades, and the singing lyricism is all in accordance with what he calls his “operatic” approach to this work. The lower tones of the basset are very rich and robust, and Mr. Neidich revels in them. The Rondo was especially notable for the way Mr. Neidich nimbly dispatched the virtuosic demands with crystal clarity. The audience gave him a loud and extended ovation, with several callbacks. The Sinfonietta deserves high marks both for following Mr. Neidich as a conductor and for taking his lead as a soloist – which is more challenging than when one conducts from the keyboard. A lot more vigilance and discipline is required from the orchestra here. It was a fine start to the evening!
Felix Mendelssohn’s Overture to Die schöne Melusine (The Fair Melusine), Op. 32 (the 1835 second edition), followed the Mozart. The piece was written in 1834 as a birthday gift for Mendelssohn’s sister Fanny. (Mendelssohn must have been a hard act to follow in the gift-giving department!) In a letter to Fanny, Felix explains that he had picked the subject after seeing Conradin Kreutzer’s opera Melusina the previous year in Berlin. In a nutshell, he hated it but was intrigued with the subject matter enough to write his own overture (perhaps his version of the alleged Beethoven quip, “I like your opera – I think I will set it to music.”). I’ll spare the reader the long story details and give the TL:DR version: Mermaid and man story ends badly. As Mr. Neidich joked, it takes longer to tell the story than it takes to play the overture! Schumann claimed he detected close musical references to the tale, which Mendelssohn denied, but it is clear there is music of happiness and storm that would mirror the outlines of the story to some degree. Clocking in around eleven minutes, it is an imaginative and lively piece that the WA Sinfonietta played with gusto (some might even claim, with too much so, but I will always take more than less!). There were some minor issues of balance, but these never really had any long-term negative impact. Mr. Neidich is an involved and energetic conductor, and his ensemble reflected that back with great effect. The audience roared its approval in another extended display of enthusiasm.
After intermission, Johannes Brahms’s Symphony No. 4 in E minor, Op. 98, was the final work of the evening. Music historian and Brahms scholar Michael Musgrave, who was scheduled to speak, was ill and unable to attend. Mr. Neidich spoke in his place. There is much information in the previously mentioned link (A Conversation with Charles Neidich), especially about the Meiningen Court Orchestra and its importance to Brahms, which I’m not going to repeat here. I will mention that the WA Sinfonietta uses the same number of players as the Meiningen Court Orchestra. As for the addition of the unpublished four-measure introduction to the first movement that was played tonight (perhaps for the first time), I will say that in my opinion it was a little too similar to an idea in Beethoven’s 7th Symphony, and its addition did not enhance anything. In other words, I am deferring to Brahms – if someone as meticulous as he was left it out, it was with good reason. My reservations notwithstanding, Mr. Neidich is to be commended for exploring this addition in the name of scholarship and seeking new paths in the interpretation of this masterpiece.
There was plenty of power in the opening movement, but a few cracked notes and imprecise attacks in the brass did occur, and there are still some balance issues to work out, which I am sure will most likely iron themselves out as this ensemble plays together more. Of course, this venue has a very live acoustic, so that was a complication. The second movement was notable for the lush string sounds, which were enchanting; the brass, however, was still having some issues with precision of attacks. The third movement was brimming with momentum as the ensemble really “dove in“ with intensity; the percussion, though, was overpowering at times. No doubt the players were caught up in the moment. The final movement is a passacaglia in which Brahms adapted the chaconne theme in the closing movement of Johann Sebastian Bach’s cantata, Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150. The main theme is eight bars long and is heard at the very start of the movement. Brahms then repeats the theme in different variations precisely thirty times, always eight bars long. It might be a cliché, but the idea of saving the best for the last was in effect here. This was the WA Sinfonietta at their finest, bringing forth the magnificence of Brahms’s conception with the brilliance it demands. The audience responded with the longest ovation I can recall. A visibly moved Mr. Neidich shook hands with nearly all the members of the Sinfonietta as the applause continued unabated. What a promising start for this ensemble! The next concert for the WA Sinfonietta is May 13, 2025, at the DiMenna Center. I look forward to following their future endeavors.
