Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mozart Mealor Martin: Music of Joy and Sadness in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mozart Mealor Martin: Music of Joy and Sadness in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mozart Mealor Martin: Music of Joy and Sadness
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra and Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Vance Y. George, James Jordan, and Joseph Martin, Conductors
Penelope Shumate, soprano; Krysty Swann, mezzo-soprano; Youngbae Yang, tenor; Jeremy Milner, bass-baritone
Stern Auditorium at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
February 15, 2016

 

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) continued its record of inspirational massed-choral and orchestra concerts, “changing lives through the power of performance,” as their motto states. It is truly a credit to the many individual local choral conductors who prepared these groups that came from all over the US, UK, Austria, and New Zealand, and had but a short time to work out a polished interpretation with all the other choirs, orchestra, and the “real” conductor. It is good to see that these individual conductors are given their own bow(s) after their groups have performed.

The concert was presented in inverse order of its title, hence Martin, Mealor, Mozart. A rather long group of faith- and patriotic-based material, all composed by Joseph Martin (one Irving Berlin arrangement) and conducted by him, opened the program on a suitably upbeat note. If the music wasn’t surprisingly original, it certainly was very pleasing and accessible for community choirs. This particular group of over two hundred had a surprisingly difficult time making itself heard over the full orchestrations, when singing at or below mezzo-forte. When singing by themselves however, the full volume passages were appropriately thrilling, although diction was fuzzy.

Would it be churlish to mention that these mass-choir events require a great deal of stage management, moving one group of two hundred off the risers, moving the next group on, etc. and that this stretches the times of the programs quite a bit? Perhaps this process could be streamlined. And please credit the excellent orchestra by listing its players; they play beautifully. After a very long “brief pause” listed in the program, came the stunning success of the evening: Paul Mealor’s Stabat Mater.

Let me go out on a limb here and state that when I die, if there “is” a heaven, I want it to sound like the music of Paul Mealor. I, like millions across the world, first heard his music in the form of the delicious Ubi caritas that was sung at the 2011 royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. Mr. Mealor has a way of conveying a divine radiance with his harmonies—although firmly anchored in traditional tonality, his way with a “cluster” creates a sort of spiritual “smudge” (he even mentions incense as an aid to worship, a high Anglican tradition) that is incredibly mysterious and moving.

The Stabat Mater, a portrait of the sorrowful mother of Jesus at the foot of the cross, hits all the satisfying points one could wish, and does not remain mired only in the pain of the scene, but progresses to acceptance, hope, and faith. The work is dedicated to Mr. Mealor’s grandparents. The conductor for this work was James Jordan (disclaimer: an alumnus of one of my alma maters: Westminster Choir College). We also share many of the same mentors in choral conducting. Of course credentials are worthless unless put into practice, and wow, were they ever put into practice. His choir sang with an infinite variety of color and dynamic contrasts, razor sharp diction despite the size of the group, and great emotion. The soprano soloist, the excellent Penelope Shumate (doing double duty in the Mozart Requiem) soared above the choir with her descant, which seemed the embodiment of light. The audience, after a transcendent and respectful silence at the end, erupted into a well-deserved standing ovation. The ensemble remained on stage for the World Premiere of a short, boisterous work Jubilate Deo, also by Mr. Mealor.

After intermission, the Mozart Requiem was conducted by Vance George, with yet another choral assembly of about two hundred. Here, the size of the choir was truly a liability. George took some quite brisk tempi that are utterly justified in light of historically-informed performance practice, but that a large choir would have trouble rendering distinctly. Again, the orchestra seemed louder than the choir, quite an accomplishment. There were numerous discrepancies of ensemble, and one false start, discreetly and rapidly remedied. The four soloists did not benefit from being separated: the two men stage left, the ladies stage right. This creates an automatic deficit in the feeling for cooperation. Ms. Shumate was joined by a fabulous mezzo-soprano, new to me, Krysty Swann, whose plumy tone was natural, never forced, and whose musicality was beautiful. The men fared somewhat less well: tenor Youngbae Yang certainly sang all the notes without strain, but without obvious emotional connection; and the bass-baritone Jeremy Milner made a stereotypically wooly, dark sound, and was out of tune in his “big” moment, the first phrase of the Tuba mirum (miraculous trumpet), which was fully a half-step too high by the end, while the trombone which symbolizes this summoning miracle messed up the arpeggios underneath the singer.

I don’t wish to carp, perhaps it was an off night for Mr. Milner, or for the choir, it is hard to wait backstage through a long concert—it certainly didn’t deter the enthusiasm of the many friends and family members of these dedicated singers who were present in the audience. After all, the motto of one of the Martin pieces “E pluribus unum” (out of many, one) could be taken as the way these singers and choirs come together as well. Truly inspiring.

Share

Composers Now Festival and CUNY Diversity Projects Development Fund present “Eastern Currents” with Ensemble 365 in Review

Composers Now Festival and CUNY Diversity Projects Development Fund present “Eastern Currents” with Ensemble 365 in Review

 Composers Now Festival and CUNY Diversity Projects Development Fund
present “Eastern Currents” with Ensemble 365
Sara Paar, soprano; Karen Rostron, violin; Alice Jones, flute; Marta Bedkowska-Reilly, cello; Mirna Lekić, piano
Tenri Cultural Institute, New York, NY
February 13, 2016

A hardy band of two dozen or so listeners braved the coldest night in one hundred years to attend a well-played program of non-standard music from the “Asian and Arab” worlds. The players in Ensemble 365 met while graduate students at CUNY in 2011, and their unity shows. Each is a very good individual artist, and they combine excellently as well.

Two works by a female composer from Azerbaijan, Franghiz Ali-Zadeh, were presented: Three Watercolors (1987) for voice and ensemble (including prepared piano). Only three of the movements contained the voice, the others were Prelude, Interlude, and Postlude for piano. The excellent soprano Sara Paar was sensitive to every expression in the text, by female Azerbaijani poet Nigyar Rafibeili. Ms. Ali-Zadeh’s second work was heard after intermission: the Music for Piano, with a glass-bead necklace placed over some of the strings, to give the impression of a folk-instrument (mugam). Mirna Lekic’s piano sound was beautiful, even when she played in the register with the necklace, and her rhythmic acuity gave subtle energy to every gesture. I’m sure many members of the audience, sitting in the chilly space of the Tenri Cultural Institute, could identify with the lines: “My soul is like the earth,/Awaiting the radiant springtime . . .”

Duo for flute and cello (2012) by Karim Al-Zand (Tunisian, but raised in Ottawa, Canada) consisted of three short movements, with the cello deliberately “mistuned” (scordatura) in the first section Musette, to mimic a drone instrument. The finale, Snapdragon, had great drive and an exciting conclusion.

In many ways, the conventionality of Arno Babadjanian (Armenian, influenced by Rachmaninoff/Khatchaturian) provided the weakest music of the night. The Larghetto of his Piano Trio in F Sharp Minor (1952) was pretty and lyrical, but it meandered, and did not seem to have the same expressive urgency that the other composers exhibited. Perhaps it would have benefited from being heard in context, between the other two movements of the complete trio.

The evening concluded with two sets of songs, again with the pure-voiced Ms. Paar, accompanied by Ms. Lekić and (in the second set) piano trio, by Ramin Heydarbeygi, who was present, and provided verbal program notes to his own music. The first set Astvihad was commissioned by Ensemble 365 in 2012. The six poems, in modern Persian (Gathic or old Avestan) all deal with death (the demon of death as conceived in the Iranian/Zoroastrian tradition), yet they were not wallowing in somber music, but rather had a sort of contained fury, appropriate to the subject.

The second set of songs Aramesh (2015) dealt with the theme of exile, and the poet of the third song Ruminations of a Tree, Dayani, was also present at the concert. The exile theme remains relevant in an age that sees massive displacement from the Middle East (Syria). How pleased both poet and musician must have been. Ensemble 365 has commissioned over 150 works, and they provide valuable and persuasive advocacy for music which would certainly otherwise languish. Bravi.

Share

DVD in Review: Pianist Gustavo Díaz-Jerez plays Iberia, by Isaac Albéniz

DVD in Review: Pianist Gustavo Díaz-Jerez plays Iberia, by Isaac Albéniz

DVD: Isaac Albéniz Iberia, Pianist: Gustavo Díaz-Jerez
Label: ORPHEUS (2015) Region Code: 0 (Worldwide); TV format: PAL
Running Time: 88 minutes

 

Attention, those interested in “firsts” in the piano world: for the very first time, a full high definition video of Iberia is now available, and it is quite beautifully played by pianist Gustavo Díaz-Jerez ( www.gustavodiazjerez.com).

For those unfamiliar with Iberia, by Spanish composer Isaac Albéniz (1860-1909), it is one of the masterpieces of the piano literature, a set of twelve pieces devoted to the sounds and impressions of the composer’s native Spain, with the emphasis on Andalusia. Though of strong local flavor, the set was loved and admired by Debussy, Messiaen, Fauré, and countless other great musicians and is now admired worldwide as a creation of universal expressiveness.

Composed from 1905 through 1909, each book was given its separate premiere by French pianist Blanche Selva (1906, 1907, 1908, and 1909) and almost each piece has sunk roots singly into the piano repertoire over time. The set is still seldom heard in live recital in its entirety of twelve movements, possibly due to length (around 90 minutes), difficulty (large orchestral textures with awkward hand distribution), and pacing (a challenge to sustain, with prolonged meditative parts and nuanced pianissimo levels down to ppppp). Many musicians cite the history as reason – that Albéniz did not envision the twelve played at a stretch and that the pieces are not meant as a marathon but better played separately.

From the 1960’s through the 1980’s, pianistic legend, Alicia de Larrocha, gave life to the entire opus in repeated recordings and performances of the set. There followed various other excellent interpretations of the set on compact disc. Videos, though, were a different story. Of de Larrocha, one can find only some of her CBS studio videotapes, and they are of poor sound quality (some even with commentary heard over the playing). Of complete live readings, there have been concerts by outstanding virtuosi such as Marc-André Hamelin, with some selections from these viewable on the Internet, but one needs to flip from link to link to hear several in a row (akin to listening to the old 78-RPM recordings). For the first full video of the complete Iberia, one had to wait for Gustavo Díaz-Jerez, whose performance, recorded in 2015, is now available on DVD (www.iberiadvd.com).

One uses the word “performance” because Mr. Díaz-Jerez does give what appears to be an unbroken recital, despite its having involved four days of recording (July 20-24, 2015). The atmosphere also approaches that of a concert despite the fact that there is no apparent audience in the beautiful hall of Paraninfo de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (the Canary Islands). The DVD opens with a dignified Mr. Díaz-Jerez, clad in black, walking with resolve towards an imposing Steinway D piano, his footsteps resonating on the large empty stage. It is seemingly a solitary event, but there is such formality and intensity in his demeanor that the occasional shift of camera focus to a hall of empty seats does not detract, but rather seems to suggest listeners past or future. There is a certain poetry in that.

From the first notes of Evocación, a feeling of spaciousness pervades, and it is clear from each expressive inflection that Mr. Díaz-Jerez is a sensitive artist with considerable dedication to this music. He soulfully projects the composer’s most heartrending melodies and lavishes each poignant turn of phrase with affection, somehow without seeming excessively self-indulgent – quite an artful balance! El Puerto follows Evocación with spirit, zest, and a perfect nostalgic lingering towards its close. Mr. Díaz-Jerez has a broad array of articulations at his disposal, and undoubtedly students will enjoy watching close-ups of his hands here and elsewhere – possibly even gaining some insight on distribution of hands in the score’s various tangles. El Corpus Christi En Sevilla brings the opening group to brilliant peaks before its quiet close, rounding out a highly successful Book I.

Book II is equally moving with an intoxicatingly sunny Rondeña and a dreamy Almeria. Mr. Díaz-Jerez has a special knack for transparent voicing in which a melody simply glows from amid other voices without badgering the listener or oversimplifying the texture. The famously challenging Triana ( Click here to view)closes this book well, expansive without being overtly showy. Here is one of the pieces that might benefit most from the synergy of a live audience, but its polish is admirable. The eternal discussion of live versus recorded is not for the current review.

A listener might want to give himself an “Intermission” at this juncture, because a saturation point can be reached. By the end of Book II, one can become so spoiled by the surfeit of sultry harmonies, nostalgic melodies, and florid ornaments, that they lose their distinctiveness. El Albaicín, El Polo, Lavapiés, Málaga, Jerez, and Eritaña all have uniquely beautiful qualities, but they do need some space after the first two books for their uniqueness to emerge. Hopefully, the listeners (viewers) will exercise some judgment in the pacing.

In summary, all the performances are excellent. Though one may have one’s favorite performances by other artists for isolated pieces, this full set makes for a fine reference collection and should be of interest for pianists negotiating the hand-overlappings and leaps for the first time. There are many close-ups. The technique in every piece is solid, there is nothing offensive, and there is much that is exemplary.

While one feels a bit incomplete not hearing the rush of applause upon the last notes of Eritaña, the silence underscores the dream element so present throughout the video. In fact, that aspect is so pervasive that one might simply decide to ignore each shot of hands and face and keyboard, and drift away. This would bring one full circle to the respective raisons d’être of DVD versus CD, visual versus aural, or in combination. As Debussy wrote of this set: “One closes one’s eyes and is bedazzled by the sheer wealth of invention in this music!” What Debussy said is true. Here, though, the listener has a choice.

 

 

Share

Violinist Daniel Röhn in Review

Violinist Daniel Röhn in Review

Daniel Röhn in Recital: The Kreisler Story
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall, New York, N.Y.
February 2, 2016

 

 

It is a rare recital that leaves one wanting to hear it all again the next day, but it is not an exaggeration to say that I wanted exactly that after hearing the recent New York recital of German violinist Daniel Röhn. In collaboration with pianist Rohan de Silva and in birthday tribute to the great Austrian composer-violinist Fritz Kreisler, Mr. Röhn combined technical wizardry, melting musicality, old-world style and panache, and a fair amount of historic edification in his comments, all woven seamlessly together into an utterly perfect evening.

Lest it appear that I have some bias towards this frothy fare, that is not the case, for many of these works I’ve heard quite often (or played as collaborator) without their holding nearly so much attraction; what was so captivating was Daniel Röhn’s easy and elegant mastery, always with beauty of sound, purity of intonation, and elasticity of phrase. It was a wonder to behold and reaffirmed the grandeur of the “Golden Age of the Violin” of the 1920’s and 1930’s.

Daniel Röhnm accompanied by pianist Rohan De Silva at Weill Recital Hall, 2/2/16. Photo by Chris Lee

Daniel Röhnm accompanied by pianist Rohan De Silva at Weill Recital Hall, 2/2/16. Photo by Chris Lee

 

Boldly and with a regal pacing Mr. Röhn opened with Kreisler’s oft-played Praeludium and Allegro, an assertive beginning. He followed it with the equally beloved Bach-Kreisler Gavotte from the E Major Partita BWV 1006, played with polish and sensitivity. Some offhand remarks put an awestruck audience at ease to enjoy the lyrical Paganini-Kreisler Caprice No. 20.

Many performers conquer these tricky works, but the labor announces itself – not so with Mr. Röhn, whose technical ease affords him a graciousness and charm so vital to this repertoire. His fluency suggest that music is his first language, and that may have been the case, for as his biographical notes tell us, he is son and grandson to two noted concertmasters. One finds, with a bit of poking around, that his grandfather, Erich Röhn, played with the Berlin Philharmonic under Fürtwangler, and his father, Andreas Röhn, with the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra. One also learns that his musical pedigree is distinguished on his pianist mother’s side, but perhaps that didn’t make as marketable a tale as the lineage of three dashing dons of the violin – and dashing this grandson is, with the tie, tails, and stage presence of a matinee idol. One expected him to dance off the stage like Astaire, which he pretty nearly did at the end of the first half, while concluding Sarasate’s Zapateado Op. 23, No. 2 (which he had likened to a Spanish relative of Riverdance – so make that Flatley, rather than Astaire).

Before this exuberant first finale came several other works. Claude Debussy’s Sonata for Violin and Piano added some heft to the program (despite its brevity). Mr. Röhn spoke eloquently about its wartime history and also the imagery one can sense in the work, though leaving such reactions open to the listeners’ imaginations. He shared as examples that “in rehearsal today we found hobbling dwarfs” and at another point vampires – inviting the uninitiated listener to dream through the piece’s darker moments. His playing matched his words in color and drama. If every performer communicated as well, as part virtuoso and part inspired educator, more concert halls would be packed – and his certainly was.

Following Debussy was the Prokofiev-Heifetz March from The Love of Three Oranges – a glimpse into the world of another titan of the violin, Jascha Heifetz. Incidentally, Heifetz’s birthday was also February 2 along with Kreisler’s, something parents of children born on this day might contemplate when choosing an instrument! The playing was once again riveting.

William Kroll’s popular Banjo and Fiddle and Josef Suk’s sentimental Song of Love Op. 7, No. 1, rounded out the smorgasbord before the show-stopping Zapateado. Throughout the program Rohan de Silva was a superb collaborator. Understandably sought after by many of the greatest violinists in the world today, Mr. de Silva plays with the kind of flexible support and hair-trigger responsiveness that it seems no cues are needed beyond sheer musical telepathy.

More works associated with Kreisler followed in the second half, including Jean-Marie Leclair’s Sonata No. 3 in D Major. Here was the only work that seemed to show a bit of flagging in energy, but the impression was short-lived. The ridiculously demanding Wieniawski-Kreisler Caprices in A Minor and E-flat Major followed with perfect brilliance. Equally engaging was the commentary describing the overtaxed students of Wieniawski, the great Polish violin master, as he piled challenge on top of challenge.

The Hungarian Dance No. 7 by Johannes Brahms added further to the playfulness, setting the scene for some humorous introductory remarks about Kreisler’s own mischievous streak. He had for several decades passed his own compositions off as penned by other composers (often 17th or 18th century ones), as it was not seemly for a performer to play an entire evening of his own works. Kreisler was in fact quite creative about it and his harmless trickery makes for fun retelling. Two of such falsely attributed works, the Tempo di Minuetto and Grave in the style of W. F. Bach, were played next, but emerged as such gems that one could almost approve of the hoax that enabled the composer to share them.

To cap off the evening was another rousing dance from Spain, Kreisler’s version of Manuel De Falla’s Danza espagnola from La vida breve. It was a dazzling finale, sending audience members to their feet. They were treated, after several curtain calls, to an encore of the very delicate “Zephyr” Op. 30, No. 5, by Jenő Hubay. Just as I was wondering how one follows an evening of so many “encores” with an encore, Mr. Röhn expressed basically the same sentiment from the stage. Meanwhile my wish for an encore of the whole evening promises to be fulfilled, as a recording of it all will be released in the summer of 2016 (unsure as to whether that is CD or DVD – hopefully the latter). Hopes are high!

Share

Yale School of Music presents Chang Pan, cello and Ronaldo Rolim, piano, in Review

Yale School of Music presents Chang Pan, cello and Ronaldo Rolim, piano, in Review

Yale School of Music presents Chang Pan, cello and Ronaldo Rolim, piano
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
February 3, 2016

A day of soaking rain in New York could not dampen the ardor of either performers or audience at this very fine recital by an extraordinary artist of the cello and his excellent collaborative pianist. The program consisted of de Falla’s Suite popular Española, the Franck Violin Sonata in A major, and two works by Grieg, the Intermezzo for Cello and Piano in A minor, and the Cello Sonata in A minor, Op. 36.

The principal virtue of Chang Pan’s playing is his extreme absorption in the music; he has a rapt, intense look, as one who is communing directly with the mysterious source “out there” that sustains and inspires true artists—and he possesses the technical ease to bring that inspiration into his instrument and project it to the listener. His bow arm, intonation, and the variety of colors he obtains from the cello are all sublime. He was beautifully partnered by Ronaldo Rolim, who managed every texture, no matter how thick or difficult, with consummate elegance.

The program itself, however, was uneven, with the first half devoted to transcriptions. Yes, I consider the Franck Sonata a transcription, even though the composer himself did somewhat grudgingly accept the transformation for cello which was made in his lifetime, saying it “does not kill the piece.” With so much original cello/piano repertoire, why not program something less often heard? I was very much looking forward to the “Festival Tianshan” which was originally billed, but that was substituted by a Grieg Intermezzo.

Three of the four pieces were in either A major or A minor, and I think artists should carefully consider the way pieces lead into and away from each other, and not fatigue the ear with too much of the same key. Okay, most of the “grumpy old man” portion of the review is out of the way.

The program began well, with six of the seven Canciones populares Españolas of Manuel de Falla, originally for voice and piano. Chang Pan immediately erased any concern about the missing words by playing each with vivid coloration and great spirit. He really made you hear the little allusion to female virginity in the first canción: “the fine cloth in the window won’t sell for much if it gets a spot on it.” Then followed the Franck Sonata, with all its overheated, incense-laden rhetoric and exaltation. I’ve often found in the past that with the necessary octave transpositions in the cello part compared to the violin original that the music doesn’t “speak” where it is intended to, and that with those same transpositions the cello line is buried more in the middle of the piano textures instead of floating over them. I had no reason for concern however, since this duo solved each and every issue forcefully. The daunting piano part was utterly transparent, not a balance problem in sight. The slow movements were notable for their elasticity and aura of spiritual communion. Each phrase and each harmonic contortion was planned meticulously and felt deeply, transitions were also excellent. I did feel that the second movement was too fast, losing some distinction in the rush. But after all, if you can’t be youthfully impetuous when you’re a youth, then when can you be?

After intermission, the pair played an unusual Intermezzo by Grieg, melancholy and lyrical, using it as a sort of slow introduction to the sonata that followed. This sonata should really be given a nickname: “Grieg’s Grab Bag,” for it plunders from his other output shamelessly, with gestures adopted wholesale from the Norwegian folksongs and dances, the lyric pieces, and “that” concerto, coincidentally also in A minor. Even the fantastic skills of these two artists could not disguise what a meretricious assemblage this “sonata” is. It grew tiresome. (Sorry, gentlemen.)

After enthusiastic, well-deserved applause, the duo played a sweet “Chinese Melody” as an encore.

Share

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mortals & Angels: A Bluegrass Te Deum in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mortals & Angels: A Bluegrass Te Deum in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Mortals & Angels: A Bluegrass Te Deum
Jonathan Griffith, DCINY Artistic Director and Principal conductor
Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Dailey & Vincent, special guests
Jay Disney and Linda Powell, narrators
Luigi Salerni, director
Carol Barnett, DCINY composer-in-residence; Marisha Chamberlain, librettist
Stern Auditorium at Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
January 25, 2016

 

How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice, practice? Not this week! “Shovel, shovel, shovel!” quipped Jamie Dailey of Dailey & Vincent, the world-renowned bluegrass group, to the delight of all those in attendance. In the aftermath of what some were calling “Snowmageddon” (or “Snowpocalypse”, if you prefer), Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presented a concert entitled Mortals and Angels: A Bluegrass Te Deum. The first half was selections from Dailey & Vincent, and the second half was the world premiere of the work for which the concert was named, Mortals and Angels; A Bluegrass Te Deum, a “follow-up” of sorts to composer Carol Barnett and librettist Marisha Chamberlain’s earlier collaboration The World Beloved: A Bluegrass Mass.

As I entered the hall, I noticed that hundreds of white handkerchiefs (with the name of the concert and date printed on them) draped over the seats. I pocketed this concert swag and was sure it was going to be of some use later.

I will admit that I had my doubts about this program beforehand. On a previous program, with the same composer and librettist, I was not entirely convinced that either musical style of the combination, bluegrass or classical, was well served, and I had some reservations about the libretto. Interested readers can follow to link to read more- Bluegrass 57@7 review. In fairness, it should be mentioned that my colleague David LaMarche did not have any such issues when he reviewed the same work in 2014 – Sounds of Americana review. Would I have the same opinion with this new work?

Dailey & Vincent took the stage to open the night. The nine members are Jamie Dailey (vocals/guitar), Darrin Vincent (bass/vocals), Aaron McCune (guitar/vocals), BJ Cherryholmes (fiddle), Bob Mummert (drums), Buddy Hyatt(piano), Jeff Parker( mandolin/vocals), Jessie Baker (banjo), and Shaun Robertson(guitar).”How many of you have heard bluegrass?” asked Jamie Dailey. “Well, you’re gonna hear some now!” he said as the group launched its six-song set. This listener is no bluegrass expert, but he is more than capable of recognizing expert playing and singing. The six selections alternated between fast and slow works, but all offered ample opportunities for these fine musicians to showcase both their individual talents in solo passages and very tight ensemble play.

Jamie Dailey bantered with the audience between numbers, introducing his band mates and telling stories about each. Darrin Vincent introduced Mr. Dailey. Just one fun fact – Shaun Robertson was appearing with the group for the first time, after being discovered on Instagram and being invited to audition for the group! We live in interesting times!

A cover of “Elizabeth”, the Statler Brothers’ hit (for which Dailey & Vincent received a Grammy nomination in 2011) was lovely, and “American Pride”, a patriotic song written by Jamie Dailey, brought the house down. A visibly moved Mr. Dailey humbly accepted the standing ovation. He has a voice that can soar with the best of them!

There was no intermission, but as Dailey & Vincent played on, the stage began to fill with singers dressed entirely in white, soon to be joined on the side of the stage by a much smaller number of very young singers dressed in all black. Conductor Jonathan Griffith took to stage dressed in blue jeans, flannel shirt with bandana, and hat, and took out his hankie and waved it to the audience, signaling the start of Mortals and Angels. Commissioned by the DCINY Premiere Project, Mortals and Angels is a thirteen-movement work that is close to an hour in length. Jay Disney was the spokesperson for the Mortals, who were represented by the children’s choir dressed in black, Dailey & Vincent, and the audience members on the parquet level. Linda Powell was the spokesperson for the Angels- the choir members dressed in all white and the audience members in the upper levels. Mr. Disney gave the “back story” for what was to happen; in short, the “Mortals” were on a fishing vacation and happened to encounter a group of Angels at the same spot (just go with it…). Mr. Disney and Ms. Powell were both “personality plus”, and their playful banter with each other and the audience as they “defended” their sides’ interests was good, clean fun, and added to the theatric quality of the work, though I’m not sure if it was really necessary. Perhaps I’ll leave it at that and let others argue for each side.

The “Mortals” sans Dailey & Vincent were overwhelmingly outnumbered by the “Angels”. I’m still wondering if it was intended for a child’s choir to be “battling” forces seven times their numbers (Mr. Disney made a remark about the 222 singers behind him, as he pointed to the “Angels”). These youngsters gave it all they had, but they were almost completely covered. This is perhaps something that should be considered in future performances.

The text of the work flows with a natural ease, without any agendas (hidden or unhidden), and the music is sincere and without any pretense. This is a winning combination, and with the unique talents of Dailey & Vincent, it was a winning performance. The audience got into the act with the waving of those white handkerchiefs. It was definitely not your typical concert experience, but it was full of raucous joy, something our world today is often lacking.

“We Don’t Stay Afraid for Long” was a favorite, both for the music, and the verse, especially the lines, “Oh, some of us believe in zombies/Some in fairies and elves/Some of believe in angels/And some of us just believe in ourselves.” There’s a lot of wisdom in those words.

So one might ask who won, the Mortals or the Angels? Let’s call it a draw, or better yet, let’s say everyone won, with special credit to Dailey & Vincent, who were the stars not just of this work, but of the entire concert.

 

Share

Pianist Ian Hobson in Review

Pianist Ian Hobson in Review

Downtown/Uptown Series: Preludes –Etudes –Variations, Ian Hobson in Recital
With spoken introduction by Paul Griffiths
Merkin Concert Hall, Kaufmann Arts Center; New York, NY
January 19, 2016

 

A good musician tries not to be too dazzled by encyclopedic repertoires – after all, it is how music is played that matters – but this listener has to confess to being dumbstruck by the sheer quantity of challenges in Ian Hobson’s latest 6-recital series in New York. From last October through this coming April, within a mere six months, he will have performed both books of Debussy’s Preludes plus complete Etudes, both books of Chopin Etudes plus complete Preludes, Rachmaninoff’s complete Preludes and complete Etudes (are you dizzy yet?), plus major sets of variations by Chopin, Rachmaninoff, Schumann, Szymanowski and Fauré, and three world premieres by contemporary composers (Stephen Taylor, Robert Chumbley, and Yehudi Wyner). I’m sure I’m omitting something. What is more, the concerts all come on the heels of an enormous 2013-14 series, a 14-recital traversal of the complete solo and chamber music of Brahms. To have prepared such a large quantity of difficult repertoire in one’s career may not be unusual today, but to have it all performable on a high level in such short succession boggles the mind – and all is somehow managed on top of Mr. Hobson’s professorships and conducting appearances. One wonders what vitamins Mr. Hobson might be taking, and how one can get some immediately!

Of course, those who have followed Mr. Hobson’s career may already be aware of his penchant for pianistic feats. Since winning the First Prize at the Leeds International Piano Competition in 1981, plus several important silver medals, Mr. Hobson has amassed a discography of over 60 releases, including the complete piano sonatas of Beethoven and Schumann, plus a complete edition of Brahms variations for piano. He is currently recording a complete edition of Chopin, of which Volume 9 has already received critical praise for “noble artistry” (Gramophone, July 2012).

Having been somewhat familiar with Mr. Hobson’s playing since my student days (when his recordings were some of the “reference” releases available in libraries), I can say that his playing has always struck me as technically strong, musically sound, reasonably grounded in scholarly study, and without any distracting eccentricities. It was therefore good to learn all these years later that he is still going strong, extremely strong!

His program selection was beautiful for this recital, pairing, as its pillars, Chopin’s Twenty-four Preludes, Op. 28, with the Rachmaninoff Variations on a Theme of Chopin, Op. 22. It is a natural pairing (in fact so natural that, for the sake of full disclosure, this reviewer performed and recorded that very pairing some nine years ago). Mr. Hobson additionally included Chopin’s Prelude in A-flat and Prelude in C-sharp minor Op. 45 (two welcome rarities in concert), plus a premiere of “Three Etudes (by any other name…)” by Robert Chumbley (b. 1954). The cohesiveness of the program was ideal, and the Chumbley work added an interesting modern-day perspective on the genre (if one can call it that) of the concert etude. Incidentally, the introductory speaker, Paul Griffiths, was eloquent and informative describing the history and characteristics of Etudes, Preludes and Variations, and it was the kind of evening perfectly designed to welcome the layperson into the realm of some of the greatest piano music ever composed.

Mr. Hobson’s performances themselves were taut and muscular, seemingly geared towards sustaining momentum and projecting with a very full sound, more often than drawing the listener in with intimacy or nuance. There was not a trace of self-indulgence to the performances – some would say a good thing – but I actually tend to like it when a performer “loses himself” in these miniatures. Though the momentum was an asset in the D-flat Prelude, which drags with many pianists, I longed for more poignant dreaming in the F-sharp major one, and perhaps more subtle piano shadings (as one also wanted in the G major). Some more details could have emerged in the storms of the F-sharp minor and B-flat minor ones as well.

It is possible that concert cycles may put pressure on a performer to keep things moving for the sake of uninitiated listeners. My neighbor in the audience began the evening by saying, “I hope these Chopin Preludes are short, because there sure are a lot of them.” One hopes that a performer will rarely need to think this way, but, as Mr. Griffiths mentioned, even Rachmaninoff had a penchant for omitting variations when the audience coughed too restlessly. I still maintain that when a performer surrenders to his artistic imagination, a listener generally can be trusted to follow suit, flu season notwithstanding. Much of Mr. Hobson’s playing was superb, as expected, but one hopes that his profusion of offerings this season will not diminish his savoring of each one.

There were high points, of course. Mr. Hobson seemed especially to relish the grace of the A major Prelude and the delicate (though treacherous) E-flat one. He sank deeply into the A-flat basses towards the end of the 17th Prelude, partly helped by the hall piano’s exceptional resonance, felt down to one’s toes. He engaged intensely in the drama of the Preludes in E-flat minor, F minor, and G minor, and the final Prelude in D minor was a wonderfully brilliant finale. The coruscating scales and thirds proved that Mr. Hobson is still very much a powerhouse.

The Rachmaninoff fared similarly well overall, but again flew by to the point where one missed some of its characteristic poetry and dreaming. Some opportunities for gentle lyricism were missed (and some messiness arose intermittently), though ultimately the work’s majesty did prevail. A large, appreciative audience was treated to an absolutely beautiful encore of the Kreisler-Rachmaninoff Liebesleid, played with winning charm and rubato worthy of the pianistic Golden Age. One eagerly awaits the next concert!

 

Share

Book Review: The Piano Teaching Legacy of Solomon Mikowsky By Kookhee Hong

Book Review: The Piano Teaching Legacy of Solomon Mikowsky By Kookhee Hong

The Piano Teaching Legacy of Solomon Mikowsky
Kookhee Hong
LAP, Lambert Academic Publishing
209 pp. (with photos and appendices)
ISBN: 978-3659804656
New York, NY, 2013

 

Breaking from the tradition of New York Concert Review as a publication chiefly about concerts and recordings, this book review is justified based on its subject, noted musical pedagogue, Solomon Mikowsky, whose musical legacy dwells in the concert halls and music schools of New York and throughout the world. As “one of the world’s most sought-after artist teachers” (Clavier), whose students have racked up over 150 international competition wins, he has been a vital if often behind-the-scenes figure in the world of concert life today.

Among Mr. Mikowsky’s students have been some highly celebrated pianists of the day, including Simone Dinnerstein, Kirill Gerstein, and others. Many are on piano faculties throughout the world, guiding the next generation of musical leaders, performing, serving on juries, and yes, still competing and performing in contests themselves. Lest the reader be misled by the word “legacy” in the book’s title, let there be no doubt that Dr. Mikowsky is still going strong after many decades of teaching, notably at the Manhattan School of Music since 1969.

What’s more than all of the credentials and success he has achieved – though going hand in hand with it – is his successful personal mission to share music, more a way of life than a profession. It is that personal mission that makes Dr Mikowsky’s career worthy of a book, rather than just a list of prizes in some compendium. His students, present and past, speak of him as a beloved friend, who has helped them artistically, personally, and even financially. They have traveled to new places because of him, tried unknown exotic repertoire because of him, sampled new foods, read new books, and met new people because of him. Together they are helping to keep the love and celebration of piano music alive. Anyone who was captivated by the 2015 film about music teacher, Seymour Bernstein (Seymour: An Introduction), should enjoy Ms. Hong’s book in a similar way, but with new dimensions: enter Solomon.

At this point, it may sound as if Ms. Hong, a former student of Dr. Mikowsky, has written a promotional puff piece, but rest assured that the book goes much deeper than that. Though one or two moments in the interview-format book may resemble the so-called “humble-brag” as various triumphs are recounted (how can they not with his string of achievements?), there is always rigorous self-assessment with Dr. Mikowsky, from the half-joking wish to refund money to students at some earlier points in his career to his comments about how much he is still always learning.

There is also much more to the book than a recollection and analysis of his teaching – beyond the ample discussion of fingering approaches, editions, and other specialized issues. Dr. Mikowsky’s life has been one of serious ups and downs, all which have made him the remarkable man that he is. The reader will find references to his Russian-Polish-Jewish roots, an engrossing account of his parents’ immigrant experience, colorful descriptions of his early days in Havana and a family jewelry business, and his musical beginnings. There are some humorous personal anecdotes, but also chilling references to his extended family’s peril at Auschwitz. There are tales of financial and personal struggle – including a physical injury preventing him from performing – but also tales of addictive Cuban croquettes. One is reminded in some ways of the much longer memoirs of another gourmand, pianist Arthur Rubinstein, as Dr. Mikowsky has a similar zest for living (without Rubinstein’s much-touted dalliances). One can only envy his current class of students. Young musicians will find in this book the constant reminder that not only must life be filled with music, but music must be filled with life.

Among the valuable cautionary tales, Dr. Mikowsky recounts various tests of character and diplomacy, such as politically constrained competitions and his dilemmas when colleagues’ students have wished to study with him. He also tells of one of his students asking to study with a different teacher, a technique specialist of dubious grounding – guessable by those in the know, but mercifully unnamed. Though there is some name-dropping, names are generally only mentioned when historically significant or of personal importance to him, such as his teachers Sentenat and Gorodnitzki.

From political obstacles to personal sacrifice, from student years in one’s homeland to scholarships in the US at Juilliard, doctoral studies at Columbia University and years of teaching, Dr. Mikowsky shares a wealth of experience – even how he became involved in a lucrative real estate investment out of his involvement in an apartment originally for the benefit of a student. Such serendipitous situations, plus much hard work have enabled him to gift performance halls and pianos to the Manhattan School of Music, the Chicago College of Performing Arts, and the City of Havana – all in addition to spearheading several festivals. It is not every piano teacher who maintains such philanthropic endeavors on the side. There are lessons to be learned from his life story as much as from the valuable section on pedagogy.

The book is a quick read at 148 pages, plus 50-plus more in appendices, and flows like a fireside chat. Ms. Hong is to be commended for achieving this effect naturally, without intrusive editorializing or ego. Part I centers on the biography of Dr. Mikowsky and Part II, on his pedagogical beliefs and experiences, with some interesting specific examples. Part III is a very generous string of appendices about pianists and teachers, plus student testimonials and lists of laureates. Those readers not interested in piano teaching may not be inclined to read Part II on pedagogy (just over half of its 148-page main text), though it seems that any lover of piano music could benefit from it all.

On a critical note, there is room for some further editing of this book (perhaps before its next printing), as some corrections are needed. Most seem not to be the fault of the author but of other contributors, but at least “sic” would be welcome occasionally, as the spelling of “Juilliard” appears “Julliard” and “book” becomes an unfortunate palindrome, which I’ll omit here. I’m sure, when a students states, “Another day goes by without me using something that you thought me…” that it was meant as, “Not a day goes by without my using something you taught me” but such errors such as these are easy to fix. The spelling of “Solomon” should be consistent, as “Salomon” in the photograph section was surprising.

Minor quibbles aside, I feel this book is a valuable addition to any music library. Dr. Mikowsky is a gift to the music world, and thankfully part of that gift is now knowable in prose form.

Share

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents The Music of Karl Jenkins in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents The Music of Karl Jenkins in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents The Music of Karl Jenkins
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra; Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Jonathan Griffith, DCINY Artistic Director and Principal Conductor
Karl Jenkins, Composer-in-Residence
Joanie Brittingham, soprano; Katherine Pracht, mezzo-soprano; Peter Scott Drackley, tenor; Michael Scarcelle, baritone; Almedin Jashari; muezzin, Iris Derke, recorder/flute
Stern Auditorium, Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
January 18, 2016

 

In what has become an annual event, Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presented a concert featuring the music of Karl Jenkins in celebrating the life and work of Martin Luther King, Jr. on the holiday named for Dr. King. The first half was to consist of the Songs of Sanctuary and the Te Deum, with the second half featuring the sixty-five-minute blockbuster The Armed Man: A Mass for Peace. A post –concert event was to follow where one could greet Mr. Jenkins and have a copy of his new autobiography, Still With the Music, signed. With singers from California, Pennsylvania, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and “individual singers from around the globe,” it had the makings of a special night.

Opening the concert was Songs of Sanctuary. This 1995 work was born of a commission from Delta Airlines to compose “something ethnic.” Adiemus was the result, using what the composer called “invented words,” a phonetic approach that allows the listener to focus on the musical content as opposed to the text. Songs of Sanctuary consists of nine pieces (Adiemus, Tintinnabulum, Cantus Inaequalis, Cantus Insolitus, In Caelum Fero, Cantus Iteratus, Amaté adea, Kayama, Hymn), which can be performed as set or individually. From the first moments of the opening of Adiemus, it was clear that the young singers were well prepared and ready to go. I could not help but smile. It was a feeling that would continue throughout the night.

Experienced Jenkins listeners will at once recognize that the melody for Amaté Adea was re-used in his later Stabat Mater in the And the Mother Did Weep movement. Highlights for this listener were the haunting Cantus Insolitus and the exuberant Kayama.

It was a delight to see the young singers on stage having the time of their lives, with faces joyfully beaming. Even the most jaded listener could not help being moved by such a sight. Conductor Jonathan Griffith served as a gentle and patient guide to his young singers with clear directional cues, such as a sweeping movement with his left hand upward when the singers were to “slide up” to the next pitch in a quasi-glissandi effect. One must give kudos to the featured vocal soloists, Joanie Brittingham and Katherine Pracht, who were excellent, and DCINY’s own Iris Derke, who did double duty with lovely recorder and flute solos.

This younger chorus filed off the stage and the Pennsbury High School Choir and Pennsbury Community Chorus from Pennsylvania took their place for the next work, the Te Deum. This 2009 work has five sections (Te Deum laudamus, Te ergo quaesumus, Aeterna fac cum sanctis tuis, Miserere nobis, Te Deum laudamus (reprise)), but is performed without pause between sections. It is a joyous, high-spirited and optimistic work. There were moments when the chorus was obscured by the orchestra, but these were passing instances that one can attribute to the orchestra’s exuberance. With the final words Non confundar in aeternum, the singers thrust their arms in the air. It was a triumphant finish to the first half, and the audience rewarded the performers with a standing ovation.

During the intermission, pictures of Mr. Jenkins and important events in his life were projected on the back wall of the stage as the stage was being prepared for the second half. Singers then began to file onto the stage, indeed so many that about thirty singers “overflowed” to the left of the stage.

In another tradition, Karl Jenkins (or more properly, Sir Karl Jenkins, O.B.E.) joined conductor Jonathan Griffith on stage for an impromptu conversation before the commencement of the second half. Maestro Griffith offered congratulations for Mr. Jenkins’ recent elevation to knighthood and being the very first Welsh composer to be so honored. Mr. Jenkins was asked if there had been any changes in his life as a consequence. “Sometimes it is easier to get a table at a restaurant,” was the reply, much to the amusement of the audience. Mr. Jenkins shared a quip made by Princess Anne, who performed the duties of the knighting- “It seems wrong to have a sword on the man who wrote The Peacemakers.” Maestro Griffith told the audience that The Armed Man had now surpassed 1800 performances since its premiere in 2000, an average of two performances a week, every week, for fifteen years.

I have written about the history of this work previously, so those readers who wish to know more can follow the link to a previous review from 2013- The Sounds of War and Peace, Chapter 2- The Music of Karl Jenkins. Maybe the meaning of the work can be summed up in a quote from the final movement “Better is peace than always war.” As it was in 2013, the accompanying movie (also called The Armed Man) was projected onto the stage back wall.

It is evident that Maestro Griffith has made this work one of his specialties. His approach is confident and assured. Even the synchronization with the images on screen was razor sharp, in a way that was truly breathtaking. This was the master at work!

Even though I have heard this work countless times, I was still struck with the power and emotion of the piece, something that happens with me quite infrequently. Some highlights included the brass rising to the challenge of the Charge! movement with the bold and decisive attacks that this section demands, in a way that missing from the 2013 performance. It made a world of difference to this listener! The Benedictus as well stood out and was especially poignant. The chorus was exceptional from start to finish, and one must recognize the fine soloists (Joanie Brittingham, soprano; Katherine Pracht, mezzo-soprano; Peter Scott Drackley, tenor; Michael Scarcelle, baritone), even if their roles were limited. The audience reacted with a prolonged standing ovation. It was an excellent concert.

Perhaps it is fitting to close this review with words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as projected onto the screen at intermission: “Darkness cannot drive out darkness. Only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that”.

Share

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Requiem for the Living: The Music of Dan Forrest in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Requiem for the Living: The Music of Dan Forrest in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Requiem for the Living: The Music of Dan Forrest
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra; Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Jo-Michael Scheibe, DCINY guest conductor; James M. Meaders, DCINY Associate Artistic Director and conductor
Dan Forrest, DCINY Visiting Composer
Viola Dacus, mezzo-soprano; Tony Burdette, tenor
Stern Auditorium, Carnegie Hall, New York, NY
January 19. 2016

 

On January 19, 2016, Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presented a concert at Stern Auditorium at Carnegie Hall featuring the music of Dan Forrest. While Mr. Forrest is a highly regarded choral composer, he is not what one would call a “household name”. It is his work Requiem for the Living that has put his name on the map, so to speak. This piece had its New York premiere at this same venue in a DCINY concert in 2014, at which this reviewer was present. It made such an impression that one can reasonably assume that this success led to the presentation of this concert.

For this event the Distinguished Concerts Singers hailed from South Carolina, Florida, Wyoming, Mississippi, Utah, Texas, California, Indiana, Canada, Oklahoma, Kentucky, and “individual singers from around the globe.” Recalling how I was moved by Requiem for the Living, I was looking forward to hearing more works from this very talented composer.

Conductor Jo- Michael Scheibe took to the stage to conduct Mr. Forrest’s In Paradisum, which opened the concert. It is an approximately thirteen-minute work, which was written a few years before Requiem for the Living. The text uses verses from the Bible (King James version) – Psalm 116:15, John 14:2-3, Revelation 21:4, and Luke 23:43.

In Paradisum opens with a sequence of massive fortissimo chords, in what the composer refers to as “pillar chords.” It is an apt description, as most of the work makes reference to these chords. It was an arresting beginning. Mr. Forrest’s setting of the text brings the potency of the words to life with consummate sensitivity, and his orchestration deepened the impact of each word. One might expect the work to end with the triumphant cry of the last words from Luke 23:43 – “In Paradise” – but Mr. Forrest had different plans. As he explained in his program notes, “eternity calls to the listener from the heavens,” and to illustrate this, the music fades away to complete silence. The effect of the fading to this listener was more one of being returned to Earth after a journey to Heaven, as if one had been shown the glory and brilliant light of the next life in advance, before receding from view. Maestro Scheibe was the “tour guide” par excellence as he led the orchestra and chorus with the sure expertise one would expect from a musician of his credentials.

It was a powerful, moving performance. Even the most ardent non-believers would have pause to reconsider their stance after hearing this majestic work.

Mr. Forrest has an undoubted gift for writing beautiful music. He does not resort to gimmicks or attempt to “reinvent the wheel” musically. His harmonic language is completely tonal, and he eschews needless complexity. The music world is filled with cynics who call such an approach limiting, but nothing could be further from the truth! It is what Mr. Forrest does with this so-called “simplistic” approach that is truly magical. To borrow a current expression, “Haters gonna hate!” This listener appreciates the courage of Mr. Forrest’s conviction in his style with admiration for the skill with which he writes.

The Te Deum followed. Cast in three movements (Praise to the Trinity, Prayers, Praise to Christ), the text comes largely from the Book of Common Prayer, with additions from the Psalms as well. The final movement was this listener’s favorite, with changing meters that heightened the tension before returning to the calm unifying theme. The sublime Psalm of Ascension ended the half.

As previously stated, I had the pleasure of reviewing the New York premiere of Requiem for the Living two years ago. Interested readers can follow the link for more information about the work and my impressions- DCINY Life and Liberty in Review. The first thing that I noticed was the conductor (James M. Meaders) and the mezzo-soprano soloist (Viola Dacus) were the same as last time (and several of the participating choruses as well), so I was especially interested in hearing what their experience was going to bring to this performance. I was pleased that this latest edition exceeded the high bar set by the earlier performance. Maestro Meaders was in full command – Vanitas Vanitatum had even more bite and driving intensity, the Sanctus had a feel of stars twinkling in the night sky, and the Lux aeterna was quite ethereal. Ms. Dacus was every bit as radiant as in 2014, and the luster of her voice in the Agnus Dei was heartbreakingly beautiful. One must also recognize tenor soloist Tony Burdette for a fine job. Using the same formula as in the In Paradisum, the music fades away to nothingness. When Maestro Meaders finally set the baton down after extended silence and slowly turned to the audience, they burst into thunderous applause.

Mr. Forrest joined the performers on the stage and the ovations escalated, continuing for several minutes. He undoubtedly made countless new “believers” in his music, and this listener for one is looking forward to hearing more works from him. Congratulations to the performers and to the composer. It was a memorable night for all.

 

Share