Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents Calling All Dawns in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presents
Calling All Dawns
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra, Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Jonathan Griffith, Music Director; Eric A. Johnson, Geoffrey Paul Boers; Guest Conductors
Anonymous 4, Guest Artists
Avery Fisher Hall, Lincoln Center; New York, NY
April 7, 2013

 Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) is an organization that gives talented musicians and vocalists an opportunity to perform in world-class venues, often performing new works of both established composers and up-and-coming talents. Today’s concert was no exception; works from Mozart, Haydn, and John Rutter, with the New York premiere of Calling All Dawns, from new talent Christopher Tin, were on the program.

In what might have been called a pre-concert performance, Anonymous 4 opened with a set of six pieces done with the skill that has made then renowned. Possibly in keeping with the “anonymous” ideal, any information about these six pieces was withheld. It was a serious omission not to have the works named, in spite of the program noting “selections to be called from the stage”.  In this day and age when everything should be done to enlighten audiences and enhance the concert experience, a golden opportunity to foster further interest was lost.

Mozart’s Regina Coeli K. 276 is a jubilant work that honors the Virgin Mary. The trumpets and timpani lend the otherwise largely string orchestration a festive quality that is in keeping with the celebration of Easter.  There is a strong reminder of Handel’s Hallelujah chorus, although it is not known whether Mozart had seen Handel’s score prior the composition.  Guest conductor Eric A. Johnson led a solid performance that featured High School and University singers from Illinois, Oregon, and California. Next came the Te Deum for the Empress Marie Therese of Franz Joseph Haydn.  Johnson styled this performance with skill, conveying the work’s regal air and showing considerable attention to detail. The transitions to C minor and back to C major were particularly sensitively done.  It seemed that conductor, orchestra, and chorus gained in confidence as the performance progressed.

John Rutter (b. 1945) describes his Gloria as a three-movement symphony that is “exalted, devotional, and jubilant by turns”.  Guest Conductor Geoffrey Paul Boers took the podium and wielded his baton with the demeanor of a wizard preparing to hurl thunderbolts.  From the arresting opening bars, one was put on notice that the Distinguished Concerts orchestra was pulling out all the stops, from the stunning brilliance of the brass playing to the electric energy in the percussion. It was especially enjoyable for this listener to hear these players shine so brightly, as I have almost always found them to be the equals of any I have heard anywhere.  The exuberant orchestra overshadowed the chorus in the outer movements, where the latter simply did not project enough volume. Interestingly enough, the singers’ than full sound turned out to be a blessing in the 2nd movement, where the chorus was actually quite radiant. In spite of these issues, it was an exciting, dynamic, and passionate performance that ended the half with a splash.

It must be a unique occurrence for a large-scale work to have its genesis from a theme written for a video game, but this is the case for Calling All Dawns, which was the only work on the second half.  In conversation with Jonathan Griffith, composer Christopher Tin (b. 1976) told the story of how Calling All Dawns came to be. The opening movement, Baba Yetu, was composed as the theme for the computer game Civilizations IV. It was so popular in the gaming world that the music went “viral”, with countless requests for more pieces from the composer.  Tin was inspired to write a large work that he described as a “four-year labor of love”.  Calling All Dawns is a forty-five minute, twelve-movement work, with each movement in a different language (Swahili, Japanese, Mandarin, Portuguese, French, Latin, Irish, Polish, Hebrew, Farsi, Sanskrit, and Maori). The idea of a multi-cultural world where we are more similar than different was Mr. Tin’s stated goal.  Mr. Tin has a gift for writing music that is immediately accessible in its tonal consonance, rhythmically vital, and appealing to the emotions. It is easy to understand why his music is so popular. One can detect similarities to other composers’ work  (e.g. Karl Jenkins, Henryk Górecki in his Third Symphony, and Mike Oldfield, especially his Music of the Spheres), which might cause some to suggest the music is derivative, but I prefer the idea of a composer finding his voice. All these caveats aside, the pairing of Tin and DCINY is an ideal partnership, and it will be interesting to hear Mr. Tin’s next work, which DCINY will be premiering in 2014.

Conductor Jonathan Griffith was the master of the situation, as is the norm for this consummate leader and musician. Any composer should be thrilled to have him at the helm when his works are played.  The orchestra had already been excellent this afternoon, but they saved the best for the last in a performance that was done with style and grace.  The supporting chorus, with singers from Australia, the United Kingdom, Vermont, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New York, was vibrant throughout with a strong performance that was not wanting in volume or passion. It was a joy to see the constantly changing soloists, from Anonymous 4, to others including members of the chorus who came forward and offered passionate performances. They were all stars today.  When two Maori in tribal dress entered the stage in the final movement and not only chanted the Maori lyrics, but did a ritual dance, it was that special DCINY “touch” that I have come to expect from this fine organization. The audience reacted after the final notes with the loudest and longest standing ovation I have ever heard at any concert. Mr. Tin was called to the stage and the ovation became deafening. It must have been one of the proudest moments in his life and it was wonderful to see. It’s an image I will not soon forget. Congratulations to DCINY for another winning performance.

Share

The Klopotic-Pierce-Zoering Trio in Review

Light and Sound Presents
The Klopotic-Pierce-Zoering Trio
Julianne Klopotic, violin; Joshua Pierce, piano; Lawrence Zoering, cello
The Old Stone House; Brooklyn, New York
April 4, 2013

Founded by violinist Julianne Klopotic, Light and Sound bills itself as a “full-spectrum music performance series.” From the experimental to the classic, with jazz/rock and world music in between, Light and Sound is  in residence at the Old Stone House in Brooklyn for the 2013 season. The Old Stone House is a very intimate venue.  The feeling is very much like the 19th century salon, with seating for a small audience in immediate proximity to the performers.  The acoustics are remarkably good for a stone building constructed in the 17th century.  The small but enthusiastic audience was treated to a performance of Franz Schubert’s Piano Trios by the Klopotic-Pierce-Zoering Trio.

These three performers each have extensive and impressive resumes as soloists.  What always remains to be seen is the end result of joining such strong personalities as an ensemble. Sometimes it does occur that the whole is less than the sum of the parts, but I am pleased that this was not the case for this trio.

The first half was the Piano Trio No. 1 in B-flat Major, Op. 99 (D. 898). This work was started in 1827 and finished in 1828, the last year of Schubert’s life.  From the opening notes of the Allegro Moderato, the trio took an assertive and confident direction with its strong, full-bodied sound. For a small venue, this was especially bold, declarative playing, led ably by the energetic pianist Pierce. It was highly satisfying. Klopotic has a very rich, singing tone that captured the optimistic essence of this movement.  Zoering’s solo in the Andante poco mosso was played with artistry.  There were some rough edges at the end of this movement, but it did not spoil the overall effect. The Rondo finale was played with gusto to the last.

The performers are to be commended on their level of concentration considering the less-than-exemplary behavior on the part of some listeners. Several of the audience members were recording the performance with their mobile phones held in the air facing the performers, while one very enthusiastic listener “conducted” by waving her arms a la Leonard Bernstein throughout the entire work, at a distance of maybe three or four feet from Klopotic.  Perhaps one should be grateful for the fact that she actually kept an accurate beat!

The second half was dedicated to the nearly hour long Piano Trio No. 2 in E-flat major, Op. 100 (D. 929). This work, completed in November 1827, was one of the few late works that Schubert actually heard played in his lifetime.  The second movement theme is well known for its prominent use in the movie Barry Lyndon; so much so that the association is as strong as the use of Mozart’s Andante movement of K. 467 is to the movie Elvira Madigan. The thematic material in this trio is extensively developed and requires tremendous attention to detail. The trio mostly met the challenge, continuing their bold approach in the opening Allegro. It was extroverted playing from completely involved players. The sublime Andante con moto was met with nodding heads and smiles from the audience, who no doubt felt the pleasure in recognition of the theme. The Scherzando was played with care but also some small issues of ensemble- -fleeting in the grand scheme of things. The Allegro Moderato finale proved the players indefatigable, with a tremendous drive that built in intensity, to the delight of the same audience members so moved by the finale of the B-flat trio. After the final E-flat chord sounded, there was a moment of silence, after which the bemused Pierce called out, “That’s it!” The audience responded with a loud, prolonged standing ovation that surely was gratifying to the trio. It was a fitting end to an excellent concert. They encored this program on April 6, 2013 at the same venue.

The Klopotic-Pierce-Zoering trio is a fine ensemble.  I do hope to have the opportunity to hear them again in the future.

Share

Hristo Popov, violin; Per Enflo, piano in Review

Hristo Popov, violin; Per Enflo, piano
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
March 13, 2013 

Violinist Hristo Popov and pianist Per Enflo have an extensive performance history as a duo, including many recordings and recent performances of all ten Beethoven violin sonatas.  Eastern Europe was the focal point of their recent concert, with music from Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary.

The first half of the program consisted of two works by the Bulgarian composer Pancho Vladigerov (1899-1978). Vladigerov was one of the  founding fathers of modern Bulgarian music and many believe him to be the most influential Bulgarian composer ever. Chant, from the Bulgarian Suite, Op. 21, No. 2 opened the concert. This work, by a 28-year-old Vladigerov, is a good example of the composer’s evolution towards a national musical idiom based on folk material. The violin part has an improvisatory quality throughout.  Mr. Popov played with sensitivity and his singing tone in the high register was unfailingly exceptional. Mr. Enflo was an attentive partner throughout.  The rippling piano passagework over the pianissimo trill of the violin and gradual fade to final silence were striking. It was an auspicious start.

The earlier Violin Sonata in D Major (Op.1) is unabashedly romantic in its tonal language and form.  It is a work that owes much to the Russian tradition, especially to Tchaikovsky. Mr. Popov navigated the rapid changes in moods in the opening Agitato movement with confidence.  The second movement’s long piano introduction and extended solo in mid-movement allowed Mr. Enflo a starring role. The jaunty final movement was played by the duo with energy and panache in a stylish ending.

The second half opened with the Violin Sonata No. 3 in A minor, Op.25, by Georges Enesco (1881-1955).  Subtitled “Dans le caractère populaire roumain”, this is an expressive, melancholic work presenting challenges that are not immediately perceived by the average listener. Pianist and violinist are both “treated” to fiendish difficulties in what could be called “high-risk/low reward”- not an enticing prospect. Mr. Popov conveyed the lament of the first movement, the haunted dreams and poltergeist-like sounds of the second movement, and the grotesque, mocking march of the finale with intelligence and consummate skill. It would be so easy for a lesser player to lapse into over emotive despondence and turn this work into a mishmash of cheap effects better suited for a silent film soundtrack. This was a performance that separated the men from the boys, so to speak. It was the highlight of the concert, and it was especially gratifying to see the audience react with such enthusiasm.

Rhapsody No. 1 for Violin and Piano, Sz. 87, from Béla Bartók ended the program. Dedicated to the legendary Hungarian violinist Joseph Szigeti, the Rhapsody uses the slow–fast (lassú—friss) paired movements of the popular Hungarian dance verbunkos. The Lassú is folk music given Bartók’s characteristic treatment and was played by Mr. Popov with charm. The Friss movement continues the folk element, with one tune having a passing resemblance to “Simple Gifts”- a la Bartók, of course.  The duo built momentum to a frenzied pitch. A temporary respite in the form of bell-like tones on the piano set the stage for a winding up of the momentum once again.  Mr. Popov played with fire, and the final cadenza-like passage had  true demonic flair. It was an outstanding performance from start to finish.

Hristo Popov is a musician’s musician. Eschewing any empty showmanship, he invests his considerable skills in giving performances that place substance over effect.  It might not always be exciting to watch, but whatever “excitement” the eyes have been denied, the ears have not. He has a worthy collaborator in Mr. Enflo and it would be a pleasure to hear this fine duo in the future.

Share

MidAmerica Productions presents “Vienna Meets Paris” in Review

MidAmerica Productions presents “Vienna Meets Paris”
Patrick Gallois, flute; Maria Prinz, piano
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
March 4, 2013
 
Patrick gallois and Maria Prinz

Patrick gallois and Maria Prinz

 

French flutist Patrick Gallois and Vienna- based pianist Maria Prinz combined their talents in a program called “Vienna Meets Paris”, the first half dedicated to Vienna, and the second half, Paris. Their no-nonsense manner upon entering the stage reflected the lives of busy professionals, but from the first sterling tones it was obvious that this was going to be something memorable.

Opening with Mr. Gallois’s arrangement of the Sonata in F major, K. 376 of Mozart, the duo gave notice that they were one with this piece, which one might expect as they have recently recorded this work for Naxos (http://www.naxos.com/catalogue/item.asp?item_code=8.573033). Ms. Prinz, who has collaborated with other prominent flutists, never allowed her playing to become overpowering, even though the piano was on the full stick.  It is also a credit to Mr. Gallois that he projected his playing with such ability that he was never in any danger of being covered.  Mr. Gallois has a full-bodied tone that sings and soars, but never allows any overblowing. He also has an assured technique that allows him to make short work of difficult passages. It was an auspicious start.

Beethoven’s National Airs with variations, Op.105 and Op. 107 were commissioned by the Scottish folk-song collector and publisher George Thompson. A Schüsserl und a Reindel, Op. 105, No. 3 and St. Patrick’s Day, Op 107, No. 4, were featured. As per the request of Thompson (“You must write the variations in a familiar, easy, and slightly brilliant style, so that the greatest number of our ladies can play and enjoy them”), Beethoven gives the pianist the bulk of the difficulty in some brilliant writing. Even “easy” pieces can be dangerous, but Mr. Gallois did not fall into this trap. He played with finesse, adding his own touches of brilliance, while Ms. Prinz’s star shone brightly in what really are piano works with flute added. Ending the first half, three Schubert songs, Gute Nach, Das Fischermädchen and Ständchen, as transcribed by Theobald Böhm (1794-1881). Böhm, who can be considered the father of the modern Western flute and the corresponding fingering system still In use, did for the flute what Liszt did for the piano in his transcriptions of these songs.  Mr. Gallois and Ms. Prinz played these songs with flair, but also with sensitivity.  It was a thoughtful and melodious departure from Vienna.

The second half took the listener to Paris with three works by French composers written explicitly for the flute. Philippe Gaubert (1879-1941) wrote in the style of his great contemporaries Franck, Debussy, and Ravel.  His Sonata for Flute and Piano No. 2 is unmistakably impressionistic in its tonal form and written with idiomatic detail that one would expect from one so familiar with the flute. Mr. Gallois captured the singing lines, the magical, and the mystical with what seemed to be the greatest of ease. This is not at all surprising considering the connection Mr. Gallois has with this work. The baton has been passed through the generations when considers the musical genealogy – Gaubert to his student Marcel Moyse to his student Joseph Rampal, to his son Jean-Pierre, to Jean-Pierre’s student Gallois.

La merle noire (The Blackbird) from Olivier Messiaen followed. Written in 1952 as a test piece for the Paris Conservatoire, this short composition was one of Messiaen’s earliest works to use the concept of notated birdsong, which was a life-long fascination of him. Mr. Gallois captured the warbling element with great imagination, and both he and Ms. Prinz conveyed its dizzying effects in a captivating performance. The Sonata for Flute and Piano by Francis Poulenc closed the program. This work is among the best-loved and most frequently performed works in the flute repertoire. It was composed with Jean-Pierre Rampal in mind. In his memoirs, Rampal mentions a phone call from Poulenc- “Jean-Pierre,” said Poulenc, “you know you’ve always wanted me to write a sonata for flute and piano? Well, I’m going to, “he said. “And the best thing is that the Americans will pay for it! I’ve been commissioned by the Coolidge Foundation to write a chamber piece in memory of Elizabeth (Sprague) Coolidge. I never knew her, so I think the piece is yours.”  Brimming with brilliance, this work is vintage Poulenc, and a successful performance requires a player who can “do it all”. Mr. Gallois brought out the bursts of optimistic energy with confidence in the first movement, the longing, wistfulness of the second movement, and the joyous whimsy of the “off to the races” finale. Ms. Prinz was with him every step of the way. Played with élan, it was a winning performance. Encores followed, of which I especially liked the “Meditation” from Massenet’s Thaïs, played with delicate beauty.

A final thought – it was particularly striking how synchronized Mr. Gallois and Ms. Prinz were throughout. It was as if they were of the same mind, a “mind-meld” that found them in perfect ensemble without any visual contact or physical cues such as nodding.  I have seen other duos that had excellent rapport, but this was truly something above and beyond the norm.  This is a pairing that has unlimited potential if they decide to continue as a duo.

Share

MidAmerica Productions presents Irrera Brothers in Review

MidAmerica Productions presents Irrera Brothers
John Irrera, violin; Joseph Irrera, piano
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
February 22, 2013
 
Irrera Brothers- Carnegie Hall

Irrera Brothers at Carnegie Hall

 

The Irrera Brothers, violinist John, and pianist Joseph, list many credentials separately as soloists, but in Weill Hall this February they joined together in a performance as a duo. It is always interesting when talented soloists play together, but when they are siblings, there is an additional layer of interest. One would expect a connection between the players that would be hard to match. By and large, I found this to be the case.

Beethoven’s Sonata for Violin and Piano in G major, Op. 96 opened the program. There were balance issues at the very beginning, with the piano covering the violin, and the playing was somewhat tentative. The notes were all there, and there were moments of beauty, but I was hoping for more. Perhaps there was some nervousness at first. The Chaconne in G minor from Italian composer Tomaso Antonio Vitali (1663-1745) followed the Beethoven and whatever nerves might have present prior had happily abated. The balance was excellent, the shaping of the dramatic lines was strongly realized, and the brothers were right with each other as they built the tension into a fever pitch.

The second half opened with the World Premiere of “Bow Shock” by Russell Scarbrough (b. 1972). Written for the Irrera Brothers in 2012, this is a work that showcases their individual and duo talents to the hilt. The composer in his program notes stated, “the term ‘Bow Shock’ comes from the field of aerodynamics and refers to a curved shock wave that proceeds a solid body moving through the atmosphere at supersonic speeds. It’s a great image for this music…and I couldn’t resist the double-entendre with the word ‘bow’.” It is a jazz-tinged, driving, hyper-energetic work that invites the listener to fasten his seatbelt for the ride. It was a win-win-win: the Irreras can be well pleased that this work shows them to such great advantage. Scarbrough should be delighted with such accomplished musicians giving his music such a dynamic performance. Finally, the listener gets the best of both worlds! After this wild ride, it was time to come back to earth with Three Romances for Violin and Piano, Op. 22 from Clara Schumann (1819-1896). These works were composed as a gift for the legendary violinist Joseph Joachim. These pieces might at first glance seem light works for the salon, but they require subtlety from the violinist and pianist alike. The Irreras clearly grasped this concept and delivered a performance full of grace, wit, and charm. Ending the program was the Sonata for Violin and Piano in D major, Op. 94a by Sergei Prokofiev (1891-1953). Originally scored for flute and piano, it was modified for violin by the composer at the request of his close friend, the great violinist David Oistrakh. This work, although “classical” in form, is unmistakably Prokofiev with its humor, lyricism, and driving energy. The Irreras evidently have a special affinity for this work, as it was a riveting performance. It was the highlight of a very successful concert.

The brothers offered two encores, The first was an arrangement of Chopin’s Nocturne in E-flat major, Op. 9, No. 2 (“for Chopin’s birthday,” stated Joseph Irrera, although Chopin himself always stated his birth date as March 1). The second was “Danse espagnole” from Manuel de Falla’s La Vida Breve,  as arranged by Fritz Kreisler in 1926.

Share

Na Young Kim in Review

New York Concert Artists and Associates presents
Na Young Kim, piano
Merkin Hall, Kaufman Music Center; New York, NY
February 21, 2013
 
Na Young Kim

Na Young Kim

 

Winner of numerous competitions, appearances throughout the world, and the full complement of degrees and diplomas from Seoul National University, New England Conservatory, Cleveland Institute of Music, and The Ohio State University, pianist Na Young Kim gave her New York debut on February 21, 2013 at Merkin Hall.

The first half of the program was all Beethoven, the Andante favori, WoO 57, and the Sonata No. 32 in C minor, Op. 111. The Andante Favori was originally intended as the middle movement of the “Waldstein” Sonata, but Beethoven replaced it with a shorter movement after being criticized for the length of the sonata.  As it stands on its own, the decision was well considered and served to improve the dramatic effect of the “Waldstein”.  As for the name Andante Favori, Beethoven’s famous pupil Czerny stated, “because of its popularity (for Beethoven played it frequently in society) he gave it the title Andante favori (“favored Andante”).  Ms. Kim gave a controlled and confident performance, bringing out the singing tone without allowing its charms to degenerate into something cloying.  It was a good start to the evening.  The Sonata No. 32 in C minor, Op. 111, Beethoven’s final piano sonata, is a work overflowing with stormy drama and transcendent beauty. With a rich performance history, including many of the legends (e.g. Richter, Kempff, Arrau),  its programming begs the question of what a new performer is going to “bring to the table”.  Happily, Ms. Kim showed herself to be up to the challenge.  The opening movement, Maestoso – Allegro con brio ed appassionato, was rendered by Ms. Kim with driving energy, clarity of lines and balance, and excellent pacing throughout.  The second movement, Arietta: Adagio molto, semplice e cantabile, was played with steady restraint. Ms Kim showed herself to be a player who patiently brings out Beethoven’s transcendent writing with understanding of the architectural and dramatic demands of this movement.  Her pianissimos were amazingly clear, even capturing a music-box sound near the end of the work.  It was an inspired performance of one the greatest works of the piano repertoire.

The second half consisted solely of Rachmaninoff’s popular Sonata No. 2 in B-flat minor, Op. 36. Originally composed in 1913, it was revised by the composer in 1931. It is the version that is most often performed today (in addition to that of Vladimir Horowitz, who with Rachmaninoff’s consent made a hybrid version of the 1913 and 1931 versions in 1940). It is a work requiring power, passion, and tremendous technique, which Rachmaninoff had in abundance. Was Ms. Kim up to the demands? From the ferocious way she attacked the opening bars, it was obvious that she was. Sterling technique throughout, power without pounding, and strong dramatic sense abounded in Ms Kim’s reading, making it all seem so easy, perhaps too much so.  It was an “A” performance that could have been “A+” with a touch more fire, but a performance of which Ms Kim can well be proud.

Ms. Kim projects an image of calm inner confidence. Everything seems to have been well thought out, planned carefully, and executed with the utmost precision. Not for a moment did she ever appear to be anything but completely in control, which may have led a visually oriented audience to fail to give her the proper respect for her technical prowess. There is little doubt that Ms. Kim has the technique and the intellect to tackle all challenges, but if I had any suggestion, it would be that she could take a few more risks and savor the adventure of her already excellent playing.

For encores, Ms. Kim played the Chopin’s “Minute” Waltz with sparkle and Robert Schumann’s Träumerei from Kinderszenen with tenderness. It was a gentle end to a memorable concert. Na Young Kim is a musician to watch.

Share

Bluegrass 57@7: The Music of Pepper Choplin, Joseph M. Martin, and Carol Barnett (DCINY) in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY)
Bluegrass 57@7: The Music of Pepper Choplin, Joseph M. Martin, and Carol Barnett
Distinguished Concerts Singers International, Monroe Crossing, Guest Artists
Stern Auditorium, Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
February 18, 2013
 
Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY): Photo credit: DCINY Production/Hiroyuki Ito

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) : Photo credit: DCINY Production/Hiroyuki Ito

 

In a concert with the title “Bluegrass 57@7” (the 57 referring to 57th Street, the location of Carnegie Hall, and the 7 referring to the 7:00PM start time), Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY) presented a program dedicated to the Bluegrass genre and its various sub-genres.  Featuring Bluegrass quintet Monroe Crossing, it had the makings of an interesting and educational evening.

The first half featured the vocal music of composers Pepper Choplin and Joseph M. Martin, with the able support of Monroe Crossing. I do believe the most accurate description of the selections presented would be Bluegrass Gospel. The music was mostly joyful and almost always tonally consonant. Indeed, no dodecaphonists were harmed in the making of this music.  Each composer conducted his own works. Highlights of Mr. Choplin’s pieces were the anthem-like “Circle of Love”, featuring the talented vocalist Emily Drennan, and the electrically-charged energy of “Joy on the Mountain”.  Mr. Martin’s “Coming Home” with soloist Sue Martin’s emotional vocals was touching. Then the ebullient Martin waved Choplin back to the stage, handing him the conductor’s baton as he took to the piano for his own “Great, Great Morning.” It had the feeling of a revival meeting. It brought the first half to an exuberant close.

The second half opened with selections from Monroe Crossing.  Monroe Crossing takes its name as homage to the “father of Bluegrass” Bill Monroe and the fact that his music was the common thread that brought the group together (“we crossed paths through the music of Bill Monroe”). Mandolin player Matt Thompson regaled the audience with stories about the group and its members with both humor and humility. in what was probably a well-rehearsed part of Monroe Crossing’s regular performances.  All showmanship and shtick aside, when this ensemble got down to the business of playing, they showed themselves to be not only committed to the art of Bluegrass, but also possessing some serious “chops” as well. The energy was infectious as they played four signature works.  All four pieces were crowd pleasers, but the last called “Bullet Train” was just pure fun from start to finish, and the audience roared its approval.

The final work on the program, Carol Barnett’s The World Beloved: A Bluegrass Mass, was composed with the talents of Monroe Crossing in mind. Matt Thompson told the audience about the challenges Monroe Crossing faced when first receiving their parts.  Not all Bluegrass musicians read notated music, as the art of Bluegrass is largely improvisatory, so this “jumble of dots” was a challenge that was overcome by having each player learn his part by listening to a recorded version. After much hard work, the parts were mastered, and Monroe Crossing has performed this work about “40 times”, according to Thompson. Composer Carol Barnett stated, “My highest hope is that listeners coming from one tradition, classical or bluegrass (and perhaps dubious about the other), might discover something new and wonderful in the combination”. It was an interesting thought and a worthy goal, but one also might feel that neither classical nor bluegrass enthusiasts would be fully satisfied by the end result.  The work is quite moving in sections, and the addition of Monroe Crossing added color, but it is open to debate how much “Bluegrass” was present amid some of the more sophisticated rhythms. Marisha Chamberlain’s libretto is quite provocative in sections, including an unconventional Credo, the thinly veiled 9/11/01 reference in the third verse of the ballad, and the feminization of God in the Conclusion. Conductor Nancy Menk was charged with the challenge of bringing this interesting concept to life, which she did with marked ability. Any reservations I might have had were of no concern to the audience, who responded with a prolonged standing ovation. The Gloria was repeated as an encore to the delight of the audience.  Ms. Barnett and Ms. Chamberlain joined the conductor on stage for bows.

Share

The Sounds of War and Peace (DCINY): Chapter 2- The Music of Karl Jenkins

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY)
The Sounds of War and Peace: Chapter 2- The Music of Karl Jenkins
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra, Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Jonathan Griffith, Music Director; Karl Jenkins, Composer-in-Residence.
Stern Auditorium, Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
January 21, 2013
 
"The Sounds of War and Peace: Chapter 2"

“The Sounds of War and Peace: Chapter 2”

“The Sounds of War and Peace,” a two-evening event begun January 20th, continued on January 21st with Chapter 2 – The music of Karl Jenkins. The United States premiere (and second performance worldwide) of Songs of the Earth was programmed with The Armed Man: A Mass for Peace and its accompanying film (also entitled The Armed Man), and it had the promise of being a fascinating evening.

The Armed Man: A Mass for Peace is probably the most frequently performed work by Karl Jenkins; in fact, it might be one of the most frequently performed works of any contemporary classical composer. Since its premiere in April 2000, The Armed Man has been performed worldwide well over 1000 times – an average of twice a week.  Although I have heard this work on recording countless times and know it well, a live performance of The Armed Man is an experience that never ceases to move me.

The Armed Man is a thirteen-movement work for orchestra, chorus and vocal soloists. Using the 15th century French song L’homme Armé as a starting point, the theme is that the armed man must be feared – an idea that is still with us in the 21st century. Using sections of the Latin Mass, the Bible, The Mahabharata, and words from Kipling, Dryden, Tennyson, Mallory, Swift, Togi Sankichi, and Guy Wilson, this hour-long work is a journey through the preparations for battle, prayers for deliverance, the call to arms, the horrors of the battle, and its aftermath, with the final declaration that “peace is better than always war”.

The accompanying film I have always had mixed feelings about. It was premiered in its current form in Johannesburg, South Africa in September 2007. The images are powerful and often disturbing, as I am sure was the intent, to highlight the horrors of war.  Quoting Jenkins, the film “greatly enhances the musical performances and inevitably leaves the audience emotionally drained, often in tears.”  I understand Jenkins’ viewpoint, but I also believe the music is powerful enough to stand on its own without any imagery.

Conductor Jonathan Griffith knows this work well and his mastery was immediately obvious.  His steady leadership kept everything under control, even deftly tackling a small ensemble problem in the “Better is Peace” movement that could have turned into a disaster. He brought it back on-track almost instantly. The Distinguished Concerts Orchestra played, especially the percussion section, with the fire this work demands. The chorus was well-prepared and a worthy collaborator to the orchestra. It was notable that the sopranos did not crash on the jagged rocks of “Charge!” in which the high A’s have claimed countless victims. Highlights included the cello solo in the Benedictus, and Iman Shamsi Ali in his off-stage Adhaan. The four vocal soloists were all impressive in their roles, limited though they were. My one disappointment was the surprisingly timid brass in the “Charge!” This was a time for them to really come to the fore and it just did not happen. All-in-all, it was a inspired performance that was held the listener from the opening snare drum marching cadence, to the chorus singing the healing words of Revelation 21:4, to end the work.

The Vocal Ensemble Brevis, an all-female choir from Croatia took to the stage to open the second half. Led by Antoaneta Radocaj-Jakovic, they presented works from the Croatian composers Josip Hatze (1879-1959) and Slavko Zlatić (1910-1961).  Hatze’s  Ljuven Sanak  (Sweet Dreams) was especially soothing after the emotionally demanding first half of the concert. Zlatić’s Varijacije na nardonu temu (Variations on a Folk Theme) was an interesting work that deserves to better known.  It was disappointing that the program notes omitted any information about the composers, the pieces, or the ensemble. This excellent assemblage deserved its proper recognition.  As a way to bridge the two large Jenkins works, the ensemble ended with his Adiemus, which they performed with great energy and polish.

While the orchestra and chorus members returned to the stage, Griffith invited Karl Jenkins to the stage to have an impromptu discussion about his new work, Songs of the Earth. Jenkins told the audience that the work came from a commission from the Cultural Olympics. He decided to use the idea of Greek mythology as the basis for the work. Jenkins’ “invented language”, first used in the Adiemus project, was the text for Songs of the Earth. Jenkins explained this gives the composer great flexibility in tone and rhythm in the vocal writing. The six movements were selected because Jenkins found them “musically stimulating” as opposed to following any defined story lines.

Songs of the Earth is an interesting combination of the early Jenkins (Adiemus and the jazz influences from his Soft Machine days) with the larger works, such as The Armed Man, Stabat Mater, and The Peacemakers. The opening movement,” Khaos”, is aptly titled. An improvised saxophone solo plays over the pulsating rhythms of the orchestra and the chorus. It has a primordial quality suggesting the birth of the unformed universe. The second movement, “Gaia: Mother Earth” has the chorus chanting her name over and over in a worshipful manner or ritualistic adoration. “Ouranos and the Heavens”, the third movement, has an ethereal quality, with a singing violin solo and another improvised saxophone solo. The fourth movement, “Dance of the Titans”, with its ever changing meter (one bar 7/8, the next bar 3/4, then the pattern repeats), has a quirky feeling that at times boarders on the grotesque. “Tethys, Goddess of Fountains and Stream”, the fifth movement, has a flowing, water-like feel that the title suggests and features another extended saxophone solo. The final movement, “The Pit of Tartarus” has a relentless driving energy that is strongly akin to the Paradisi Gloria from Jenkins’ own Stabat Mater.

Mr. Jenkins should be pleased at the fine performance of his new work which made it a great success. Congratulations are in order for the chorus from Pennsburry, Pennsylvania (consisting of the High School Concert and Women’s Concert choirs with the Community Chorus), the Distinguished Concerts Orchestra, and conductor Griffith, who combined their considerable talents to make it all come together. Songs of the Earth should take its place with other of Mr. Jenkins’ popular works, and I’m sure his many fans will be looking forward to future performances.

Share

The Sounds of War and Peace (DCINY): Chapter 1 in Review

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY)
The Sounds of War and Peace: Chapter 1
Distinguished Concerts Orchestra, Distinguished Concerts Singers International
Francisco J. Núñez, composer/conductor; Jonathan Willcocks, composer/conductor
Stern Auditorium, Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
January 20, 2013
 
DCINY

The Sounds of War and Peace: Chapter 1

 

Distinguished Concerts International New York (DCINY), well-known for themed programs, created a concert series called “The Sounds of War and Peace”.  Over two nights, each “chapter” focuses on music that expresses not only the horrors of war and its aftermath, but also the idea of peace through the idea of multi-cultural understanding and cooperation.  On January 20, 2013, Chapter 1 was performed- the first half “peace”, and after intermission, “war”.

The first half, featuring elementary and middle school-aged performers from Georgia, Connecticut, Texas, Pennsylvania, and Maryland was conducted by the multi-talented Francisco J. Núñez.  Billed in the program as “Music for Future Peacemakers”, it was a selection of works that could be best described as having the qualities of child-like innocence, rather than having any more overt “peace “message. It was more William Blake than Mohandas Gandhi.  Opening with Kayama from Adiemus: Songs of Sanctuary by Karl Jenkins, the night got off to a good start. One of Jenkins’ earlier works, it already incorporates many elements of what could be called his signature sound – an easily sung melody combined with the flavor of diverse multi-cultural influences, especially in percussion and rhythm. The “words” of this piece are invented and are not part of any recognizable language, lending it what the program notes described as a  “tribal” sound.  It was given a joyful performance.  Dôme épais, better known as the “Flower duet”, from Leo Delibes’ Lakmé followed. The soprano and mezzo-soprano soloists (whose names were not mentioned) sang this favorite with polish in an arrangement by Núñez. The chorus was challenged by the some of the upper register sections, not at all surprising considering the age of the performers.  It did seem to be a curious selection that did not really fit in with the other works or the theme of the concert itself. Three Dominican Folk Songs, as arranged by Núñez, captured the essence of nursery songs. From the playful, to the poignant, and even to the mocking, the young performers brought it all to life.  After this whimsy, a more serious selection was in order, and selections from Misa Pequeña Para Niños (A Children’s Mass) fulfilled this. Composed by Núñez in memory of his father, it is a fitting tribute written by a composer who has a great understanding of the limitations and possibilities of the child’s voice.  The three selected movements were rendered with great feeling and in conjunction with the “big sound” of the orchestra elicited from the young performers a collective sound beyond their years.  The remaining selections brought back the spirit of joy and hope. The polyrhythmic clapping in Aaron Siegel’s The Light Come Down was a highlight of the evening and brought the crowd’s roaring approval. Sesere Eeye, complete with hands waving, jumps, and leaning forward, was the signal that the fun was back, which continued in Oye by Jim Papoulis.  Even Núñez got into the act, dancing at the podium while the singers spun around in their own dance, reminiscent of Gustavo Dudamel with the Simón Bolívar Youth Orchestra.  Ending with the anthem-like Give Us Hope from Papoulis, the hearts of the audience were won over completely. It was truly touching to see the smiles and excitement on the faces of the young performers – a memory that will be with them always.

The adults took to the stage for the “war” second half- the Carnegie Hall premier of A Great and Glorious Victory, conducted by the work’s composer Jonathan Willcocks.  This work was commissioned to mark the bicentenary of the Battle of Trafalgar. Scored for tenor soloist, chorus and orchestra mirroring Haydn in his Nelson Mass, the four movements use words from the Latin Requiem Mass, the Book of Common Prayer, and contemporary accounts of the events, including Nelson’s.

This four- movement work not only commemorates the well-known battle and it’s most famous personality, Admiral Nelson, but a much lesser-known event that occurred after the battle. A terrible storm after the battle had finished threatened all the combatants and in the spirit of cooperation and brotherhood, they put their differences aside and aided the others regardless of nationality.

The first movement, Preparation, is a solemn prelude to the coming battle. One can feel the rising tensions as there are prayers for strength and hope of victory. The second, Conflict, has the chorus singing the Dies Irae while the tenor soloist is singing the words of Nelson at the same time.  It was an inspired idea that highlighted the idea of battle.  Eventually, the battle slows and the Lacrymosa quietly ends the movement. Storm, the third movement, featured the tenor soloist singing off-stage (in this case, in the balcony) from the Book of Common Prayer asking for deliverance from the terrible storm. Finally, the last movement, Reconciliation, highlights the ideal of a new peace, where the former enemies cast aside their differences. It ends with the tenor soloist singing off-stage while his voice fades to silence. The composer refers to this movement as the heart of the work.

Willcocks proved to be an effective and engaging conductor, while tenor soloist Daniel Shirley’s voice soared over the large forces with strength and clarity. The DCINY orchestra played with intensity and brought out both the savage and the sublime. The large chorus was well prepared and sang with great fervor and passion.  A Great and Glorious Victory wasn’t composed with DCINY in mind, but it is a work they could make their own.  It was a memorable performance. 

Share

Suzanna Klintcharova in Review

ArtFusion Paris Presents Suzanna Klintcharova, harp
Weill Recital Hall at Carnegie Hall; New York, NY
December 27, 2012

In a concert originally scheduled for October 31, 2012, Bulgarian-born French-based harpist Suzanna Klintcharova took the stage at Weill Recital Hall nearly two months later. Hurricane Sandy had caused an 80-ton boom from a crane to become unsecured and swing wildly across from Carnegie Hall at a height of nearly 1000 feet. Countless concerts had to be cancelled. Some will not be rescheduled, and others have been pushed back as late as June 2013.  One must commend Ms. Klintcharova for rescheduling after what had to have been a terrifying experience; not only the storm itself, but being unable to leave the city after all airports were closed as well.

Ms. Klintcharova was introduced by the Bulgarian ambassador to the United Nations, who referred to her as a friend and a national treasure. It was gratifying to see an artist honored in such a way – I would be very surprised if any American artist got a similar introduction in Sofia from one of our own ambassadors.

In a program that would be a welcome antidote after such a storm, Ms. Klintcharova presented a selection of rather conservative works. This in itself was not a bad thing, but it was a bit puzzling considering that in her biography it is stated that she is very much interested in contemporary music and improvisation. The most recent work on the program was written in 1970 and not exactly on the cutting-edge.

Opening with two Sonatas (K. 132 and K. 531) by Domenico Scarlatti (1685-1757), Ms. Klintcharova showed her meticulous attention to detail.  The Grand Sonata for harp by a composer much better known for his extensive violin output, Giovanni Battista Viotti (1755-1824), followed. Other than an awkward moment in the Allegro Brillante, Ms. Klintcharova navigated the technical hurdles with apparent ease and captured the sparkling nature of the work without any grand gestures or histrionics. It was an intelligent approach from a sensitive and thoughtful musician.

The second half began with Lolita the dancer, more commonly known as Lolita la danseuse, the third piece from Images-1st suite, Op. 29, written in 1925 by the French composer and harp pedagogue Marcel Tournier (1879-1951). Ms. Klintcharova captured the essence of a temperamental diva with her incisive playing; Lolita pouts, she flirts, she stomps her feet, she laughs and cries, and she soars all in the space of three minutes. It was a delight. Archipel 5A, composed in 1970 by  André Boucourechliev (1925-1997), Bulgarian-born but considered a French composer, followed. Archipel 5A is the harp part from a larger work, Anarchipel, for six players, composed in the same year and separated as a stand-alone work. It is an aleatory work that the composer owes much to his time spent in the United States exploring the form and his encounters with proponents of chance elements in music, such as John Cage.  Ms. Klintcharova is as much at home in this form as in the more conventional. Her performance took the spirit of a dream, albeit a rather tormented, uneasy dream. It was skilfully conceived and executed in its details. As a finale, another nod to the impressionistic style of Tournier, the less frequently performed Sonatine No. 2, Op. 45, was played with elegance and refinement. The appreciative audience called Ms. Klintcharova back to the stage with loud applause.  As final thanks for her audience, she played the Moderato movement of the Sonata in C minor by Giovanni Battista Pescetti (1704-1766), as transcribed for harp by Carlos Salzedo. A beautiful piece, it was played beautifully as well, and Ms. Klintcharova closed the evening in fine style.

Share